Interactive tasks as a means of theoretical training in physical education of students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0302

Keywords:

physical education, students, higher education, interest, interactive tasks, teaching methods

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The research background is the challenges faced by Ukrainian educators, such as distance learning, martial law, and the digitalisation of the educational space. The purpose of the research is to determine the influence of interactive tasks in physical education on students’ mastery of the theoretical material through distance learning. Material and Methods. The research involved first-year students (n=245). Students were divided into three groups: experimental group 1 (n=86), experimental group 2 (n=81), control group (n=78). The research was conducted over seven months of the 2022-2023 academic year. At the beginning and end of the research, a survey was conducted to determine interest in the discipline of “physical education”. The essence of the experiment was to provide theoretical information to students using various methods and forms. During the experiment, students’ theoretical preparedness was tested three times (using Google Forms). The research results were processed using licensed Microsoft Excel spreadsheet packages. The relationship between the indicators was established using correlation analysis. The reliability of differences in mean values was assessed by Student’s criterion, and the difference was considered significant at p<0.05. Results. The low level of students’ interest in physical education was established (52%). 19% of students consider the role of physical education to be important for maintaining personal health. There is a close and medium correlation between students’ subjective interest in the discipline “Physical Education” and their opinion about the importance of this discipline for their further professional activity and for maintaining their own health. The results of all theoretical tests in both experimental groups were significantly better than the results of the control group (t=13.479-2.049). The level of interest in physical education among students in both experimental groups increased after the experiment. Conclusions. The use of interactive tasks in physical education classes has a positive effect on the effectiveness of students' studying and mastering of theoretical material. The interactive games increased students’ cognitive motivation, interest in personal health, and responsibility for their own activities to achieve results.

Author Biographies

Olena Nesen, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

PhD of Physical Education and Sport; helena.nesen@gmail.com; Department of Theory, Methodology and Practice of Physical Education; Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Viktoriya Klymenchenko, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

lubich310@gmail.com; Department of Theory, Methodology and Practice of Physical Education; Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Iryna Kryventsova, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

PhD of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor;  kriventsova.ira@ukr.net; Department of Theory, Methodology and Practice of Physical Education; Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Lidiya Zavatska, Academician Stepan Demianchuk International University of Economics and Humanities

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor;  liz6050@ukr.net; Department of Theory and Methods of Physical Education and Adaptive Physical Education, Faculty of Health, Physical Education and Sports; Rivne, Ukraine.

Mateusz Tomanek, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun

mtomanek@umk.pl; Department of Business Excellence; Torun, Poland.

Wladyslaw Jagiello, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport

wjagiello1@wp.pl; Department of Sport; Gdansk, Poland.

References

Homon L, Holoviichuk I, Nesterenko O, Hloba T, Ploshynska A. Health-Forming Technology of Physical Education of Higher Educational Institution Students Based on Sports-Oriented Training. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2022;11(3): 64. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n3p64

Bezkopylnyi O, Bazylchuk O, Sushchenko L, Bazylchuk V, Dutchak Y, Ostapenko H. Peculiarities of application of interactive educational technologies in training of future teachers of physical culture to work with health protection in secondary school. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2020; 20 (Suppl. issue 1):291 – 7, https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s1040

Bondar SP. Methods of activating the educational and cognitive activity of students as an important component of person-oriented education. Naukovij chasopis NPU imeni M. P. Dragomanova. Seriia 5. Pedagogichni nauki, 2011; 26:184-9. (In Ukrainian).

Dzhurynskyi P. Interactive methods of teaching students majoring in “physical education” at active and reproductive stage. Science and Education, 2015; 2:21-6.

Nesen O, Kozlov A, Spuziak V. Increasing the interest of future primary school teachers in performing independent work during studies at institutions of higher education. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: «Pedagogy. Social Work». 2023; 1 (52):124-8.

Vaskov YV, Sizonenko IE. The ways of implementing interactive methods in the educational process of students of higher educational institutions. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2015;19(2): 11–15. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2015.0202

Marchenko N, Vanovska I. Interactive Methods of Teaching the Humanities in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 2020;4(12): 53–57. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.L1099.0841220

Hidayat C, Setia A, Rohyana A, Purwanto D, Razali R, Rosalina M. Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education: Critical Thinking. European Journal of Educational Research, 2023;12(2): 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1137

Bellaera L, Weinstein-Jones Y, Ilie S, Baker ST. Critical thinking in practice: The priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2021;41: 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856

Carr R, Palmer S, Hagel P. Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2015;16(3): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589529

Gordienko YV. Theoretical training in physical education of higher educational establishments’ girl students. Physical Education of Students, 2015;19(4): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2015.0401

Ntoumanis N, Standage M. Motivation in physical education classes: A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 2009;7(2): 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104324

Arufe-Giráldez V, Sanmiguel-Rodríguez A, Ramos-Álvarez O, Navarro-Patón R. News of the Pedagogical Models in Physical Education—A Quick Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023;20(3): 2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032586

Surovov AA, Bondar TS. Prospects of application of interactive methods in the process of preparation of future teachers of physical culture. Teoriia ta Metodika Fizichnogo Vikhovannia, 2012; 1:17-36. (In Ukrainian).

Сrisp G. Interactive online learning and assessment. In: EDUCAUSE in Australasia 03: expanding the learning community, meeting the challenges, 6-9 May 2003 Adelaide, Australia. Adelaide: Causal Productions; 2003. P. 840-8.

AbdElsamie A. 7 Innovative Teaching Strategies To Engage Students In Online Learning. [Internet]; 2023 Apr 3 [cited 2023 Apr 30]. Available from: https://elearningindustry.com/innovative-teaching-strategies-to-engage-students-in-online-learning

Kirch A, Schnitzius M, Spengler S, Blaschke S, Mess F. Knowing Students’ Characteristics: Opportunities to Adapt Physical Education Teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021;12: 619944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619944

Cantos CFM. Physical education and the comprehensive model in the inclusion of the university student. Year 2019. South Florida Journal of Development, 2021;2(2): 1631–1635. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv2n2-039

Bevans K, Fitzpatrick LA, Sanchez B, Forrest CB. Individual and Instructional Determinants of Student Engagement in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2010;29(4): 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.29.4.399

Scheiter K, Wiebe E, Holsanova J. Theoretical and Instructional Aspects of Learning with Visualizations: In: Zheng RZ (ed.) Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning, IGI Global; 2009. p. 67–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-158-2.ch005

Vaskov Y. Enhancing the Quality of Physical Culture Education: Exploring the Role of Communicative Competence in Physical Culture Teachers. Physical Culture, Recreation and Rehabilitation. 2022;1(2):30-3. https://doi.org/10.15561/physcult.2022.0203

Vaskov Y. Exploring the Role of Teaching Aids in Enhancing Physical Education for Schoolchildren: A Literature Review. Physical Culture, Recreation and Rehabilitation. 2022;1(2):21-4. https://doi.org/10.15561/physcult.2022.0201

Nesen O. Development of speed and strength abilities of children aged 12-13 years in physical education classes in the COVID-19 pandemic. Pedagogy of Health. 2022;1(1):4-10. https://doi.org/10.15561/health.2022.0101

Kryventsova I, Potop V, Prusik K, Samoilov D. Development of coordination abilities of fencers aged 10-12 years living in the territory of martial law. Pedagogy of Health. 2022;1(2):34-8. https://doi.org/10.15561/health.2022.0201

Downloads

Published

— Updated on 2023-06-29

How to Cite

1.
Nesen O, Klymenchenko V, Kryventsova I, Zavatska L, Tomanek M, Jagiello W. Interactive tasks as a means of theoretical training in physical education of students. Physical Education of Students. 2023;27(3):104-11. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0302
Statistics

Abstract views: 783 / PDF downloads: 393

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>