Physical activity of the university's senior students




physical culture, physical activity, metabolic equivalent, physical preparedness


Background and Study Aim. To prevent hypodynamics, to evaluate the volume and level of weekly physical activity of the university's senior students. Material and methods. The study involved students (n = 244) aged 19-20 years (n = 157 - boys, n = 87 - girls). The students studied in the 4th year of the Technical University (Russia). The following parameters were investigated: physical activity (PA), the intensity of metabolic processes and motor skills. The volume of weekly physical activity was determined by a short form of the IPAQ-SF physical activity questionnaire. The level of physical activity intensity was determined by the formula of a metabolic equivalent of task (MET) (min/week). According to MET, students are divided into three groups: 1st group with a high level; 2nd group with average level; 3rd group with low level. The battery of motor tests used to evaluate students' physical preparedness. Results. The total intensive and non-intensive weekly motor activity of boys was 6.2 hours (372 min). This confirms with the standard volume (6 hours) recommended by WHO. The total motor activity of the girls (intense and non-intense) was 4.5 hours (271.6 min) per week. More than a quarter of the surveyed boys had a high level of physical activity. About 62% of students had an average level and 12.7% had a low level. Among all surveyed girls 16.1% have a high level of physical activity, 41.4% had an average level and 42.5% had a low level. The results of boys with a low level of physical activity in all motor tests were lower than the results of boys with high and average levels of physical activity. The exception was the results of the Seated Forward Bend test (p <0.05). In 6 motor tests, the results of girls with a low level of physical activity were worse than the results of female students with a high level of weekly physical activity (p <0.05). There are no significant differences between the test results in girls with low and average levels of weekly physical activity.  Conclusions. After completing the course on the subject "Elective Courses in Physical Culture and Sports", the physical activity of students remains high enough. 12.7% of boys and 42.5% of girls with low levels of physical activity and MET were identified among the surveyed student population. This allows aligning them into a group at risk of developing non-communicable diseases. To reduce the hypodynamics of junior courses students at risk, it should use individually directed pedagogical technologies of physical education. In presenting the theoretical section of the subject "Physical Culture" to the senior courses students it is necessary to strengthen their motivation for independent motor activity.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mikhail M. Kolokoltsev, Irkutsk National Research Technical University

Doctor of Medical Sciences, prof.;; Irkutsk National Research Technical University; Irkutsk, Russia

Wladyslaw Jagiello, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport; Department Combat Sports and Personal Training; Kazimierza Górskiego 1, 80-336 Gdańsk, Poland.


1. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. [Internet]. WHO, 2004. [updated 2019 Jun 15; cited 2019 Nov 5]. Available from:

2. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. [Internet]. WHO, 2009. Geneva, World Health Organization. [updated 2019 Jun 25; cited 2019 Nov 5]. Available from:

3. Caballero BA. Nutrition Paradox – Underweight and Obesity in Developing Countries. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2005; 352(15): 1514– 1516.

4. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. [Internet]. WHO, Geneva: 2008. [updated 2019 Jun 25; cited 2019 Nov 5]. Available from:

5. Basset D, Fitzhugh E, Heaz G, Erwin P, Frederick G, Wolff D. et al. Estimated energy expenditures for school-based policies and active living. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2013; 44(2): 108–113

6. Olafsdottir AS, Torfadottir JE, Arngrimsson SA. Health Behavior and Metabolic Risk Factors Associated with Normal Weight Obesity in Adolescents. PLoS ONE, 2016;11 (8).

7. Gerber M, Ludyga S, Mucke M, Colledge F, Brand S, Puhse U. Low vigorous physical activity is associated with increased adrenocortical reactivity to psychosocial stress in students with high stress perceptions. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;80:104-113.

8. World Health Organization. European Regional Office. Physical Activity Strategy for the WHO European Region, 2016-2025. World Health Organization. European Regional Office. [Internet]. 2016. [updated 2019 Jun 25; cited 2019 Nov 5]. Available from:

9. Krasnobon SV. Motor activity as a criterion of health level. Physical culture. Sport. Tourism. Motor Recreation, 2017; 2 (1): 46-52. (In Russian)

10. Khrushchev SV, Schleifer AA. Health Improvement of Children (Modern Problems): Chronicle. Journal of Sports Medicine of Russia, 2012; 1: 65. (In Russian)

11. Palomino-Devia C, Reyes-Oyola FA, Sanchez-Oliver A. Levels of physical activity, health-related quality of life, physical self-concept and body-mass index among Colombian students. Biomedica. 2018;38(2):224-231.

12. Sukharev AG. The concept of strengthening the health of children and adolescents in Russia. Healthy children of Russia in the XXI century. Moscow: Russia; 2009. (In Russian)

13. Kim TK. State of health and motor activity of children and young people as a social and pedagogical problem. Science and school, 2012;3:13-16. Available from: (In Russian)

14. Janssen I. Physical activity guidelines for children and youth. Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism, 2007; 32:109– 121.

15. Gorеlov AA, Tretiakov AA. Nervous-emotional tension and methods to increase students 'resilience to its effects. Belhorod, Russia: CPI "Politicra," 2012. (In Russian)

16. Abdullina LB. Formation of healthy lifestyle of students in conditions of modern university: practical-oriented aspect. Health saving education, 2014; 2: 78-82. (In Russian)

17. Sierra-Diaz MJ, Gonzalez-Villora S, Pastor-Vicedo JC, Lopez-Sanchez GF. Can We Motivate Students to Practice Physical Activities and Sports Through Models-Based Practice? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychosocial Factors Related to Physical Education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10

18. Di Battista R, Robazza C, Ruiz MC, Bertollo M, Vitali F, Bortoli L. Student intention to engage in leisure-time physical activity: The interplay of task-involving climate, competence need satisfaction and psychobiosocial states in physical education. European Physical Education Review. 2019;25(3):761-777.

19. Moy B, Renshaw I, Davids K. The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2016; 21 (5): 517–538. Available from:

20. Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Sedentary Behaviour, Physical Activity and Life Satisfaction, Happiness and Perceived Health Status in University Students from 24 Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(12).

21. Munir Talović, Ifet Mahmutović, Eldin Jelešković, Denis Sedić, Haris Alić, Rasim Lakota, Šemso Ormanović, Nedim Čović, Emir Mustafović. Quantitative changes of specific motor abilities of students under the influence of regular and additional activitiesin sport and physical education. Port Science International scientific journal of kinesiology, 2015; 8 (2): 34-37

22. Kozlov AV, Pasko GV, Khromina S I. (Eds). Optimal motor regime as a mandatory factor of healthy lifestyle of students. Sports, sports and educational and patriotic activities in universities: innovations in solving topical problems: Мaterials of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference. Tyumen,Russia: TIU, 2018. (In Russian)

23. Bergier J, Tsos A, Popovych D, Bergier B, Niznikowska E, Acs P, et al. Level of and Factors Determining Physical Activity in Students in Ukraine and the Visegrad Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(8).

24. Loginov SI, Nikolayev AJ, Vetoshnikov AJ, Sagadeeva SG. Physical activity of students of two universities of Surgut according to the international questionnaire IPAQ. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2015; 9:83-85. (In Russian)

25. Maximichina EV, Ugovskaya OV. To the question of the state of health and motor activity of students of junior courses. International Scientific Journal Symbol of Science, 2016; 12-2: 218-220. (In Russian)

26. Kondakov VL, Kopeikina EN, Usatov AN, Voronin IU, Balysheva NV. Comparative analysis of the magnitude and nature of motor activity of university students. Contemporary Science and Education Problems, 2015; 2-2. Available from: (In Russian)

27. Kobyakov YuP. Concept of human motor activity norms. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2003; 11:20-23. (In Russian)

28. Kolpakova ЕM. Мotor activity and its effect on human health. Health, Physical Culture and Sports. 2018; 1(8): 94-109. Available from: (In Russian)

29. Cora L Craid, Alison L Marshall, Michael Sjostrom et all. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity. Medicine Science in Sports Exercise. 2003:1381- 1395.

30. EUROHIS: Development of common tools for health surveys. Moscow, Russia: Human Rights, 2005. (In Russian)

31. Potemkina RA. Increasing physical activity in the population of Russia: сurrent approaches to elaborating population programs. Preventive medicine, 2014; 1: 6-11. (In Russian)

32. Fiona C Bull, Tahlia S Maslin and Timothy Armstrong. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): Nine Country Reliability and Validity Study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2009; 6:790- 804.

33. Strategy of development of physical culture and sports of Russia. Approved by Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1101-r of 7 August 2009. (In Russian)

34. Matveev LP. About common problems of theory and practice of physical culture. Theory and practice of physics. Culture, 1982; 7: 5 - 8. (In Russian)

35. Nazarov of PA. Forecast of some time spent by student youth by 2000. Theory and practice of physics. cultures, 1977; 11: 59 - 62. (In Russian)

36. WHO Library cataloguing-in-publication data. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva, 2010.

37. Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association American Stroke Association. Stroke, 2014; 45 (8): 2532-2553.

38. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) - short and long forms. [Internet]. 2005 November [updated 2019 Jun 15; cited 2019 Nov 5]. Available from:, free. — Title of screen. pdf

39. The president's challenge: Physical fitness test. 2011. [July 14, 2011]. Available from:

40. Grzybovsky AM. Data types, distribution checking and descriptive statistics. Ecology of the person. 2008; 1: 52–58. (In Russian)

41. Hagstromer M, Ainsworth BE, Pekka O, Sjostrom M. Comparison of a Subjective and an Objective Measure of Physical Activity in a Population Sample. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2010;7: 541- 550.

42. Ghrouz AK, Noohu MM, Manzar MD, Spence DW, BaHammam AS, Pandi-Perumal SR. Physical activity and sleep quality in relation to mental health among college students. Sleep and Breathing. 2019;23(2):627-634.

43. Sersar I, Mekhancha DE, Vuillemin A, Schneider SM, Nezzal L, Dahel-Mekhancha CC. Association of physical activity and sleep with the body composition of algerian university students. Science & Sports. 2019;34(2):73-81.

44. Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Dunstan DW. Screen based entertainment time, all-cause mortality and hospital events follow-up. J. of the Amer. college of cardiology. 2011;57(3) : 292–299.

45. Adewale L Oyeyemi, Adetoyeje Y Oyeyemi, Babatunde O Adegoke, Fatima O Oyetoke, Habeeb N Aliyu, Salamatu U Aliyu, and Adamu A Rufai. The short international physical activity questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, validation and reliability of the Hausa language version in Nigeria. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11: 156.

46. Penglee N, Christiana RW, Battista RA, Rosenberg E. Smartphone Use and Physical Activity among College Students in Health Science-Related Majors in the United States and Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(8).

47. Interdepartmental strategy for the formation of a healthy lifestyle, prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases for the period up to 2025. Moscow; 2016. (In Russian)

48. Townsend N, Wickramasinghe K, Williams J. Physical activity statistics 2015. London : Brit. Heart Foundation, 2015.

49. Gutierrez-Martinez L, Martinez RG, Gonzalez SA, Bolivar MA, Estupinan OV, Sarmiento OL. Effects of a strategy for the promotion of physical activity in students from Bogota. Revista De Saude Publica. 2018;52.

50. Snedden TR, Scerpella J, Kliethermes SA, Norman RS, Blyholder L, Sanfilippo J, et al. Sport and Physical Activity Level Impacts Health-Related Quality of Life Among Collegiate Students. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2019;33(5):675-682.

51. Pate RR, O'Neill JR, Lobelo F. The evolving definition of "sedentary”. Exercise and sport sciences rev. 2008; 36 (4):173- 178.

52. Soto-Ruiz MN, Aguinaga-Ontoso I, Guillen-Grima F, Marin-Fernandez B. Changes in the physical activity of university students during the first three years of university. Nutricion Hospitalaria. 2019;36(5):1157-1162.

53. Moral-Garcia JE, Ruiz-Ariza A, Grao-Cruces A, De La Torre-Cruz MJ, Martinez-Lopez EJ. Satisfaction of spanish high school students with physical education: gender, age, physical activity level and body type. South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation. 2018;40(1):71-84.

54. Blanco H, Benavides EV, Tristan JL, Mayorga-Vega D. Physical activity body image and personal self-concept in female mexican university students. Revista De Psicologia Del Deporte. 2017;26:25-33.

55. Ledezma YSR, Vega DM, Perez JEP, Lujan JCB. Physical activity, physical self-concept and psychological well-being in women meajcan university students. Revista De Psicologia Del Deporte. 2017;26:61-69.

56. Denisova GS. The dependence of the body mass of students of a special department of the Altai State University on the nature of nutrition and the optimal level of motor activity. Health, Physical Culture and Sports, 2019;1(12):127-152. Available from: (in Russian)

57. Spakov AI, Krumina LP, Mischenko AN, Obelevsky AG, Pavlyuti OV. Self-assessment of students "motor activity and their attitude to the organization of physical education (comparison of research data in 2005 and 2015). Health-saving technologies and systems: psycho-pedagogical and medical-biological aspects. Мaterials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Baranovici, Belarus, 2016. (In Russian)

58. Zhang Z, Chen B, Chen W. The mediating effect of perceived health on the relationship between physical activity and subjective well-being in Chinese college students. Journal of American College Health 2019:1–8.

59. Xu F, Wang XR, Xiang DD, Wang ZY, Ye Q, Ware RS. Awareness of knowledge and practice regarding physical activity: A population based prospective, observational study among students in Nanjing, China. Plos One. 2017;12(6).

60. Zurita-Ortega F, Badicu G, Chacon-Cuberos R, Castro-Sanchez M. Motivational Climate and Physical Activity: A Multigroup Analysis in Romanian and Spanish University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(11).

61. Potop V, Timnea OC, Stanescu M. Improving sports technique of stretched Gienger salto on uneven bars based on biomechanical indicators. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 2017;7(8):472- 480.

62. Potop V, Timnea O, Stănescu M. Correlative analysis of the kinematic and dynamic characteristics of sports technique used in acrobatic elements and performances achieved by junior gymnasts in balance beam events. Conference proceedings, Volume 17. Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, 2017;21: P. 231-238.

63. Kubieva SS, Botagariev TA, Zhetimekov EТ. Рhysical fitness and physical development of varios profiles university students. Health, Physical Culture and Sports, 2018; 2 (9): 26-49. Available from: (in Russian)

64. Minibayeva ED, Vasilieva AG. Development of a methodology for determining and evaluating the formation of the level of motor activity of a student of a technical university. Scientific review. Pedagogical sciences. 2015; 2: 158-158.

65. McDonough DJ, Pope ZC, Zeng N, Lee JE, Gao Z. Comparison of College Student's Energy Expenditure, Physical Activity, and Enjoyment during Exergaming and Traditional Exercise. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018;7(11).

66. Jagiełło W. Perkal’s method of natural indicators in the assessment of internal proportions of body composition in persons practicing combat sports – a review. Arch Budo, 2019; 15: 187-193.

67. Jagiello W. Differentiation of the body composition in taekwondo-ITF competitors of the men's Polish national team and direct based athletes. Archives of Budo. 2015;11:329-338.

68. Elizabeth G Eakin, Kerry Mummery, Marina M Reeves, Sheleigh P Lawler, Grant Schofield, Alison J Marshall and Wendy J Brown Correlates of pedometer use: results from a community-based physical activity intervention trial (10,000 Steps Rockhampton). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2007; 4(31):1- 7.




How to Cite

Kolokoltsev MM, Jagiello W. Physical activity of the university’s senior students. Physical Education of Students. 2020;24(1):31-9.

Abstract views: 914 / PDF downloads: 543