Discriminant analysis: peculiarities of impact of sports specialization on 3rd-year female students’ functional and motor fitness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2021.0606Keywords:
students, badminton, aerobics, callanetics, discriminant analysisAbstract
Background and Study Aim. The objective of the study was to determine the peculiarities of impact of sports specialization on 3rd-year female students’ functional and motor fitness. Materials and methods. The study involved 3rd-year female students of the Donbas State Engineering Academy in Kramatorsk, who practiced badminton (n = 43), aerobics (n = 43), and callanetics (n = 43). To solve the tasks set, the following research methods were used: analysis of scientific literature, pedagogical observation, pedagogical testing; index method and medical-biological methods. Pedagogical methods were used to study the peculiarities of students’ functional state of the body and motor abilities; for data processing discriminant analysis was used. Sectional classes were held in groups according to the schedule – twice a week. Results. The study revealed the peculiarities of impact of attending badminton, aerobics, and callanetics sports sections on the level of 3rd-year female students’ functional and motor fitness. The female students who play badminton show better results in the 100-meter dash and the Standing long jump. In the exercise “Push-ups”, better results are shown by the female students who do aerobics. Conclusions. The results of classification of students by the level of motor and functional fitness and the analysis of multidimensional averages (centroids) point to the peculiarities of dynamics of female students’ state depending on sports specialization. The results of the following tests are most important for differentiated assessment of the state of motor and functional fitness at the first level: Romberg test (r = 0.662), 100-meter dash (r = 0.491), Push-ups (r = 0.491). At the second level – Stange test (r = 0.417), Standing long jump (r = 0.412).Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Chernenko S, Honcharenko O, Marchenko S. Informative Indicators of Functional and Motor Fitness of Students of Higher Education Institutions. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2019; 19(3): 107–115.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.3.01
2. Solohubova S, Lakhno O, Shyyan V, Shyyan O. The Assessment of Physical Fitness and Morphofunctional State of Female First-Year Students in Non-Linguistic Higher Education Institutions. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2020; 20(3); 157–164.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.3.05
3. Bielikova N, Tsos A, Indyka S, Contiero D, Pantik V, Tomaschuk O, Dedeliuk N, Podubinska S. The motor activity status and students’ self- assessment of health during a covid-19 pandemic. Sport Mont. 2021; 19: 95–99.
https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.210901
4. Sigmundová D, Chmelík F, Sigmund E, Feltlová D, Frömel K. Physical activity in the lifestyle of Czech university students: Meeting health recommendations. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013; 13(6): 744–50.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.776638
5. Cachón-Zagalaz J, Sánchez-Zafra M, Lara-Sánchez A, Zagalaz-Sánchez ML, Shmatkov D. Study on the relationship between physical activity and the development of professional competence: Findings from a study in Ukraine. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2020; 15(3): 591–607.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.153.10
6. Doroshenko E, Hurieieva A, Symonik A, Chernenko O, Chernenko A, Serdyuk D, Svatiev A, Tsarenko K. Differentiation of Physical Loads in Female Students of Different Motor Ages. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2021; 21(2): 158–166.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2021.2.09
7. Kramer PA. The effect on energy expenditure of walking on gradients or carrying burdens. American Journal of Human Biology, 2010; 22(4): 497–507.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21027
8. Almeida L, Fernandes HM. Relationship between physical education, school satisfaction, psychological well-being and academic achievement in vocational students. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2019; 14(proc4): S1427–S1429.
9. Pashkevich S, Kriventsova I, Galicheva K. Using Movement Test to Evaluate Effectiveness of Health and Fitness Activities of Students in Higher Education Institutions. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2018; 18(1): 12–22.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2018.1.02
10. Aguilera DA, Rivera-Aguilera VS, Cordovés-Peinado R. Strategy proposal for the redesign of the Subject Program Athletics I of the Physical Education career curriculum approach by competence according to the educational model of the university. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2020; 15(Proc4); 1394–1406.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc4.36
11. Amin HM, Karim AA, Jassim RAW. Prediction of some types of handball throws according to the attention expressions of physical education and sports Sciences female students. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2019; 14(Proc5): S1842–S1852.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc5.03
12. Aparicio-Sarmiento A, Gómez-Carmona CD, Martínez-Romero MT, Gamonales JM, Sainz De Baranda P. The effect of a specific core training program in physical education on perceived exertion and technique. Journal of Sport and Health Research, 2021; 13(2): 195–210.
13. Newton F, McCall A, Ryan D, Blackburne C, aus der Fünten K, Meyer T, Lewin C, McCunn R. Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) score does not predict injury in English Premier League youth academy football players. Science and Medicine in Football, 2017; 1(2): 102–106.
https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2017.1283436
14. Liao T, Zheng W, Meng Y. Application of Functional Movement Screen to the Evaluation of Youth’s Physical Health. In: Salmon P., Macquet AC. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Sports and Outdoor Recreation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2017; 496.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41953-4_17
15. Tsigilis N, Douda H, Tokmakidis SP. Test-retest reliability of the Eurofit test battery administered to university students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2002; 95(3): 1295–1300.
https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.95.8.1295-1300
16. Cosma G, Chiracu A, Stepan A, Gatzel R, Iancu A, Cosma A. Sportsmanship and basic psychological needs in sports students. Balt J Health Phys Activ. 2021; 13: 53–65.
https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.13.Spec.Iss1.05
17. Kovács K, Moravecz M, Nagy Z, Rábai D, Szabó D. The institutional effect on leisure time and competitive sports at higher education colleges and universities in the Carpathian Basin. Balt J Health Phys Activ. 2020; 12: 46–59.
https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.12.Spec.Iss1.06
18. Ivashchenko O. Methodic of pedagogic control of 16-17 years’ age girls’ motor fitness. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2016; 20(5): 26–32.
https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2016.0504
19. Chernenko S, Iermakov S, Oliinyk O, Dolynnyi Y. Pattern Recognition: Description of Functional and Motor Preparedness of Students of Higher Educational Institutions. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2018; 18(4): 200–206.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2018.4.06
20. Sgro’ F, Quinto A, Pignato S, Lipoma M. Comparison of product and process oriented model accuracy for assessing countermovement vertical jump motor proficiency in pre-adolescents. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2016; 16(3): 921–926.
https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.03145
21. Lindner KJ, Caine DJ., Johns DP. Withdrawal predictors among physical and performance characteristics of female competitive gymnasts. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1991; 9(3): 259–272.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419108729888
22. Jukić, I., Milanović, D., & Vuleta, D. (1999). Analysis of changes in indicators of functional and motor readiness of female basketball players within one-year training cycles. Collegium Antropologicum, 1999; 23(2): 691–706.
23. Pion J, Hohmann A, Liu T, Lenoir M, Segers V. Predictive models reduce talent development costs in female gymnastics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017; 35(8): 806–811.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1192669
24. Laughlin NT, Busk PL. Relationships between selected muscle endurance tasks and gender. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2007; 21(2): 400–404.
https://doi.org/10.1519/R-16204.1
25. Fridolfsson J, Arvidsson D, Andersen LB, Thorsson O, Wollmer P, Rosengren B, Karlsson MK, Dencker M. Physical activity spectrum discriminant analysis – A method to compare detailed patterns between groups. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2021; 31(12): 2333–2342.
https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14052
26. Kumar AM. Regular discovery and sorting of workout in the health scenario. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 2017; 8(3): 91–95.
https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2017.00247.9
27. Serhiienko LP. Comprehensive testing of human motor abilities. Mykolaiv: UDMTU; 2001. (In Ukrainian).
28. Romanenko VA. Human motor ability. Donetsk: New World; 1999. (In Russian).
29. Krutcevich TIu. Methods of researching the individual health of children and adolescents in the process of physical education. Kiev: Olympic literature; 1999. (In Russian).
30. Ivashchenko O. Research Program: Modeling of Motor Abilities Development and Teaching of Schoolchildren. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2020; 20(1): 32–41.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.05
31. Choi SM, Sum KWR, Wallhead TL, Leung FLE, Ha SCA, Sit HPC. Operationalizing physical literacy through sport education in a university physical education program. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2021; 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1915266
32. Lynch S, Sargent J. Using the meaningful physical education features as a lens to view student experiences of democratic pedagogy in higher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2020; 25(6): 629–642.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1779684
33. Tohmea GM, Najam NR, Tohmea WM. The effect of pilates exercises on some physical components among first stage female students of the faculty of physical education and sports sciences Wasit University. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2020; 15(Proc2): 146–153.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc2.04
34. Hovey K, Niland D, Foley JT. The impact of participation in an outdoor education program on physical education teacher education student self-efficacy to teach outdoor education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2020; 39(1); 18–27.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0288
35. Koryahin V, Turchyn Y, Blavt O, Dolnikova L. Information Systems of Support of Pedagogical Control in the Physical Education of Students. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2020; 20(4): 205–211.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.4.02
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.3.01
2. Solohubova S, Lakhno O, Shyyan V, Shyyan O. The Assessment of Physical Fitness and Morphofunctional State of Female First-Year Students in Non-Linguistic Higher Education Institutions. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2020; 20(3); 157–164.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.3.05
3. Bielikova N, Tsos A, Indyka S, Contiero D, Pantik V, Tomaschuk O, Dedeliuk N, Podubinska S. The motor activity status and students’ self- assessment of health during a covid-19 pandemic. Sport Mont. 2021; 19: 95–99.
https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.210901
4. Sigmundová D, Chmelík F, Sigmund E, Feltlová D, Frömel K. Physical activity in the lifestyle of Czech university students: Meeting health recommendations. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013; 13(6): 744–50.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.776638
5. Cachón-Zagalaz J, Sánchez-Zafra M, Lara-Sánchez A, Zagalaz-Sánchez ML, Shmatkov D. Study on the relationship between physical activity and the development of professional competence: Findings from a study in Ukraine. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2020; 15(3): 591–607.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.153.10
6. Doroshenko E, Hurieieva A, Symonik A, Chernenko O, Chernenko A, Serdyuk D, Svatiev A, Tsarenko K. Differentiation of Physical Loads in Female Students of Different Motor Ages. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2021; 21(2): 158–166.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2021.2.09
7. Kramer PA. The effect on energy expenditure of walking on gradients or carrying burdens. American Journal of Human Biology, 2010; 22(4): 497–507.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21027
8. Almeida L, Fernandes HM. Relationship between physical education, school satisfaction, psychological well-being and academic achievement in vocational students. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2019; 14(proc4): S1427–S1429.
9. Pashkevich S, Kriventsova I, Galicheva K. Using Movement Test to Evaluate Effectiveness of Health and Fitness Activities of Students in Higher Education Institutions. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2018; 18(1): 12–22.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2018.1.02
10. Aguilera DA, Rivera-Aguilera VS, Cordovés-Peinado R. Strategy proposal for the redesign of the Subject Program Athletics I of the Physical Education career curriculum approach by competence according to the educational model of the university. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2020; 15(Proc4); 1394–1406.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc4.36
11. Amin HM, Karim AA, Jassim RAW. Prediction of some types of handball throws according to the attention expressions of physical education and sports Sciences female students. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2019; 14(Proc5): S1842–S1852.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc5.03
12. Aparicio-Sarmiento A, Gómez-Carmona CD, Martínez-Romero MT, Gamonales JM, Sainz De Baranda P. The effect of a specific core training program in physical education on perceived exertion and technique. Journal of Sport and Health Research, 2021; 13(2): 195–210.
13. Newton F, McCall A, Ryan D, Blackburne C, aus der Fünten K, Meyer T, Lewin C, McCunn R. Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) score does not predict injury in English Premier League youth academy football players. Science and Medicine in Football, 2017; 1(2): 102–106.
https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2017.1283436
14. Liao T, Zheng W, Meng Y. Application of Functional Movement Screen to the Evaluation of Youth’s Physical Health. In: Salmon P., Macquet AC. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Sports and Outdoor Recreation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2017; 496.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41953-4_17
15. Tsigilis N, Douda H, Tokmakidis SP. Test-retest reliability of the Eurofit test battery administered to university students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2002; 95(3): 1295–1300.
https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.95.8.1295-1300
16. Cosma G, Chiracu A, Stepan A, Gatzel R, Iancu A, Cosma A. Sportsmanship and basic psychological needs in sports students. Balt J Health Phys Activ. 2021; 13: 53–65.
https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.13.Spec.Iss1.05
17. Kovács K, Moravecz M, Nagy Z, Rábai D, Szabó D. The institutional effect on leisure time and competitive sports at higher education colleges and universities in the Carpathian Basin. Balt J Health Phys Activ. 2020; 12: 46–59.
https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.12.Spec.Iss1.06
18. Ivashchenko O. Methodic of pedagogic control of 16-17 years’ age girls’ motor fitness. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2016; 20(5): 26–32.
https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2016.0504
19. Chernenko S, Iermakov S, Oliinyk O, Dolynnyi Y. Pattern Recognition: Description of Functional and Motor Preparedness of Students of Higher Educational Institutions. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2018; 18(4): 200–206.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2018.4.06
20. Sgro’ F, Quinto A, Pignato S, Lipoma M. Comparison of product and process oriented model accuracy for assessing countermovement vertical jump motor proficiency in pre-adolescents. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2016; 16(3): 921–926.
https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.03145
21. Lindner KJ, Caine DJ., Johns DP. Withdrawal predictors among physical and performance characteristics of female competitive gymnasts. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1991; 9(3): 259–272.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419108729888
22. Jukić, I., Milanović, D., & Vuleta, D. (1999). Analysis of changes in indicators of functional and motor readiness of female basketball players within one-year training cycles. Collegium Antropologicum, 1999; 23(2): 691–706.
23. Pion J, Hohmann A, Liu T, Lenoir M, Segers V. Predictive models reduce talent development costs in female gymnastics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017; 35(8): 806–811.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1192669
24. Laughlin NT, Busk PL. Relationships between selected muscle endurance tasks and gender. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2007; 21(2): 400–404.
https://doi.org/10.1519/R-16204.1
25. Fridolfsson J, Arvidsson D, Andersen LB, Thorsson O, Wollmer P, Rosengren B, Karlsson MK, Dencker M. Physical activity spectrum discriminant analysis – A method to compare detailed patterns between groups. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2021; 31(12): 2333–2342.
https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14052
26. Kumar AM. Regular discovery and sorting of workout in the health scenario. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 2017; 8(3): 91–95.
https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2017.00247.9
27. Serhiienko LP. Comprehensive testing of human motor abilities. Mykolaiv: UDMTU; 2001. (In Ukrainian).
28. Romanenko VA. Human motor ability. Donetsk: New World; 1999. (In Russian).
29. Krutcevich TIu. Methods of researching the individual health of children and adolescents in the process of physical education. Kiev: Olympic literature; 1999. (In Russian).
30. Ivashchenko O. Research Program: Modeling of Motor Abilities Development and Teaching of Schoolchildren. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2020; 20(1): 32–41.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.05
31. Choi SM, Sum KWR, Wallhead TL, Leung FLE, Ha SCA, Sit HPC. Operationalizing physical literacy through sport education in a university physical education program. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2021; 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1915266
32. Lynch S, Sargent J. Using the meaningful physical education features as a lens to view student experiences of democratic pedagogy in higher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2020; 25(6): 629–642.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1779684
33. Tohmea GM, Najam NR, Tohmea WM. The effect of pilates exercises on some physical components among first stage female students of the faculty of physical education and sports sciences Wasit University. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2020; 15(Proc2): 146–153.
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc2.04
34. Hovey K, Niland D, Foley JT. The impact of participation in an outdoor education program on physical education teacher education student self-efficacy to teach outdoor education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2020; 39(1); 18–27.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0288
35. Koryahin V, Turchyn Y, Blavt O, Dolnikova L. Information Systems of Support of Pedagogical Control in the Physical Education of Students. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 2020; 20(4): 205–211.
https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.4.02
Downloads
Published
2021-12-30
How to Cite
1.
Chernenko S, Jagiello W, Ivashchenko O, Khudolii O, Pashkevich S. Discriminant analysis: peculiarities of impact of sports specialization on 3rd-year female students’ functional and motor fitness. Physical Education of Students. 2021;25(6):374-81. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2021.0606
Issue
License
Copyright Holder - Author(s). more
Statistics
Abstract views: 455 / PDF downloads: 248
