The effect of somatotype characters on selected physical performance parameters

Keywords: Body Composition, physical fitness, somatotype components


Background and Study Aim: The physical structure is considered as one of the elements for sporting success. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of somatotype characters on selected physical performance parameters. Material and Methods: This study was included 150 males (age: 22.10±2.46 years) participants who do not have habit of regular exercise. The somatotype characters of participants were determined and physical performance tests (30 m sprint, vertical jump, anaerobic power, aerobic capacity, and flexibility) were measured as an experimental design. Results: As a result of the research, 9 different somatotype subgroups were identified. In this study, the statistically significant was found between groups in terms of explosive force, aerobic and anaerobic power output (p<0.05). We found no significant between groups in terms of flexibility (p=0.670), relative anaerobic peak (p=0.560) and mean power output (p=0.077). The results were obtained in favor of mesomorph-endomorph structure in terms of absolute peak and mean power, while mesomorph and ectomorph component contributed positively to explosive force and aerobic capacity scores.Conclusion: Our study highlighted the fact that the subgroups of somatotype have an effect on performance parameters. The body-performance relationship can be examined in detail with more participants representing each somatotype group.


Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 106 | PDF Downloads: 83 |

Author Biographies

F.S. Çinarli, Inonu University; Malatya, Turkey
M.E. Kafkas, Inonu University; Malatya, Turkey


1. Kutáč P. Somatic parameters of 17 year old soccer players in the older youth category in relation to sports performance. Acta Gymnica. 2013;43(3):17- 26.

2. Nikolaidis PT, Afonso J, Busko K. Differences in anthropometry, somatotype, body composition and physiological characteristics of female volleyball players by competition level. Sport Sciences for Health. 2015;11(1):29-35.

3. Carter JEL, Heath BI. Somatotyping. Development and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press;1990.

4. Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball: physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2006;20(4):740-744.

5. Bale P, Colley E, Mayhew JL, Piper FC, Ware JS. Anthropometric and somatotype variables related to strength in American football players. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 1994;34(4):383-389.

6. Ahvazi SP, Sadeghi H, Gholami M. The effect of eight weeks of flexibility training on step length, range of motion, and balance of middle-aged men and women with ectomorph and endomorph body types. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2014;4(1):278-282.

7. Salimi HR, Heidari N, Salimi A. The relation between somatotype with aerobic capacity and balance in the boys 11-13 years. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology. 2016;2(2):23-26.

8. Jakovljevic S, Karalejic M, Pajic Z, Gardasevic B, Mandic R. Influence of anthropometric characteristics on speed abilities of 14 years old elite male basketball players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2011;11(2):221-225.

9. Saha S. Somatotype, body composition and explosive power of athlete and non-athlete. Archives of Exercise in Health and Disease. 2015;5(1):354-358. 10.5628/aehd.v5i1-2.174

10. Noh JW, Kim JH, Kim J. Somatotype analysis of Korean wrestling athletes compared with non-athletes for sports health sciences. Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences. 2013;5(3):163-168. 10.1007/s13530-013-0170-9

11. Ramirez-Velez R, Argothyd R, Meneses-Echavez JF, Sanchez-Puccini MB, Lopez-Alban CA, Cohen DD. Anthropometric characteristics and physical performance of colombian elite male wrestlers. Asian journal of sports medicine. 2014;5(4):1-4.

12. Busko K, Lewandowska J, Lipińska M, Michalski R, Pastuszak A. Somatotype-variables related to muscle torque and power output in female volleyball players. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2013;15(2):119-126.

13. Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine. 2000;30(1):1-15.

14. Santos EL, Novaes JS, Reis VM, Giannella-Neto A. Low sampling rates bias outcomes from the Wingate test. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010;31(11):784-789.

15. Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test. Sports Medicine. 2008;38(1):37-51.

16. Gualdi-Russo E, Graziani I. Anthropometric somatotype of Italian sport participants. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 1993;33(3):282-291.

17. Gasparini S. The major role of physical and morphological features in competition success. Journal of Administrative Management, Education and Training. 2016;12(3):234-236.

18. Gontarev S, Kalac R, Zivkovic V, Ameti V, Redjepi A. Anthropometrical Characteristics and Somatotype of Young Macedonian Soccer Players. International Journal of Morphology. 2016;34(1):160-167.

19. Arjunan R. An analysis of somatotype characteristics of college level sprinters. Indian Journal of applied research. 2015;5(11):58-59.

20. Marta CC, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Carneiro AL, Izquierdo M, Marques MC. Effects of body fat and dominant somatotype on explosive strength and aerobic capacity trainability in prepubescent children. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27(12):3233-3244.

21. Kandel M, Baeyens JP, Clarys P. Somatotype, training and performance in Ironman athletes. European Journal of Sport Science. 2014;14(4):301-308. 10.1080/17461391.2013.813971

22. de Faria Pastore JC, de Azevedo Ferreira CA, da Costa FCH, João PV. Kinanthropometric Profile of Beach Volleyball Player of Category under 19 and under 21 of European Championship. International Journal of Sports and Physical Education. 2016;2(2):20-24.

23. Moss SL, McWhannell N, Michalsik LB, Twist C. Anthropometric and physical performance characteristics of top-elite, elite and non-elite youth female team handball players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2015;33(17): 1780-1789.

24. Alkandari JR, Nieto MB. Somatotype Components, Aerobic Fitness and Grip Strength in Kuwaiti Males and Females. Health. 2016;8(13):1349-1355. 10.4236/health.2016.813135

25. Singh AK, Elayaraja M, Jaiswal A. Somatotyping and Biomotor Features of Male Children of Chandauli and Mirzapur Districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. American Journal of Sports Science. 2016;4(1-1):9-14. 10.11648/j.ajss.s.2016040101.12

26. Chaouachi M, Chaouachi A, Chamari K, Chtara M, Feki Y, Amri M, Trudeau F. Effects of dominant somatotype on aerobic capacity trainability. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;39(12):954-959.

27. Sınırkavak G, Uğur D, Çetinkaya Ö. The Relation between the body composition and maximal oxygen capacity in elite sportsmen. Faculty of Medicine Journal. 2004;6(4):171-176.

28. Sánchez-Puccini MB, Argothy-Bucheli RE, Meneses-Echávez JF, López-Albán CA, Ramírez-Vélez R. Anthropometric and physical fitness characterization of male elite karate athletes. Int. J. Morphol. 2014;32(3):1026-31.

29. Lewandowska J, Buśko K, Pastuszak A, Boguszewska K. Somatotype variables related to muscle torque and power in judoists. Journal of human kinetics. 2011;30:21-28.

30. Quarrie KL, Wilson BD. Force production in the rugby union scrum. Journal of Sport Science. 2000;8(4):237-246.
How to Cite
Çinarli F, Kafkas M. The effect of somatotype characters on selected physical performance parameters. Physical education of students. 2019;23(6):279-87.