Understanding of coaches with young athletes

  • B.G. Kedrovskiy Kherson State University
  • O.G. Shalar Kherson State University
  • A.V. Grinevich Kherson State University
Keywords: athletics, understanding, compromise, collaboration


The problems of understanding coaches athletes with athletes. It is studied orientation of the individual coaches. It is studied their job satisfaction and how to respond to situations of conflict. The study involved 4 coaches in athletics of varying skill levels, and 64 athletes. Found that all the athletes are sociable, communicative, able to listen, which correspond to a high level (0.6-2.1%). Athletes appreciate their coaches sensitivity, kindness, friendliness. It was found that the rate of burnout is very low (18% to 26%) of all the coaches, which indicates emotional stability trainers, strong enough foundation for their functionality. It is shown the availability of coaches and athletes joint features. Almost all of the coaches and athletes are a temperamental group of extroverts are strong, energetic and emotionally stable individuals. This fact greatly facilitates relationships and encourages productive collaboration.


Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 248 | PDF Downloads: 422 |


Voronova V.I. Psikhologiia sportu [Sports Psychology], Kiev, Olympic Literature, 2007, 432 p.

Il'in E.P. Psikhologiia sporta [Sports Psychology], Sankt Petersburg, Peter, 2009, 352 p.

Il'in E.P. Psikhologiia obshcheniia i mezhlichnostnykh otnoshenij [Psychology of communication and interpersonal relationships], Sankt Petersburg, Peter, 2010, 576 p.

Lozhkin G.V., Poviakel' N.I. Prakticheskaia psikhologiia konflikta [Applied psychology of conflict], Kiev, IAM Publ., 2003, 253 p.

Lomov B.F. Psikhicheskaia reguliaciia deiatel'nosti [Mental regulation], Moscow, IP RAN Publ., 2006, 626 p.

Platonov K.K. Sistema psikhologii i teoriia otrazheniia [System of psychology and the theory of reflection], Moscow, Science, 1982, 308 p.

Taras A.E. Psikhologiia sporta [Sports Psychology], Moscow, АSТ, Harvest, 2005, 352 p.

Davids K., Handford C., Williams M. The natural physical alternative to cognitive theories of motor behaviour: An invitation for interdisciplinary research in sports science? Journal of Sports Sciences, 1994, vol. 12(6), pp. 495–528.

Yelling M., Penney D., Swaine I.L. Physical Activity in Physical Education: A Case Study Investigation. European Journal of Physical Education, 2000, vol. 5(1), pp. 45–66.

How to Cite
Kedrovskiy B, Shalar O, Grinevich A. Understanding of coaches with young athletes. Physical education of students. 2013;17(4):31-4. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.669666