The impact of body-size adjustment on the interpretation of physical fitness test outcomes in physical education students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2026.0403Keywords:
anthropometric scaling, motor performance, sex differences, Eurofit battery, young adultsAbstract
Background and Study Aim. Field-based physical fitness tests are widely used in the assessment of physical education students. However, test interpretation is often based on absolute outcomes that do not account for differences in body size, potentially influencing the evaluation of sex- and country-related differences. The aim of this study was to determine whether the interpretation of selected physical fitness test outcomes differs when absolute results and simple body-size-adjusted indicators are applied. Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 515 undergraduate physical education students from Poland (n = 258) and Romania (n = 257). Physical fitness was assessed using three Eurofit tests: plate tapping, sit-ups, and standing long jump. Test outcomes were analyzed using both absolute values and simple body-size-adjusted indicators. Sex- and country-related differences were examined using two-way analysis of variance. Results. Analyses based on absolute outcomes revealed significant sex- and country-related differences across all tests, with a particularly large sex effect observed in the standing long jump. After adjustment for body size, group differences were substantially reduced in tests requiring body mass displacement, and sex-related differences in the standing long jump were no longer statistically significant. In contrast, the results of the plate tapping test remained unchanged regardless of the method used to express performance outcomes. Conclusions. The findings indicate that the interpretation of physical fitness test results in physical education students may vary depending on whether absolute outcomes or simple body-size-adjusted indicators are used. The applied ratio-based adjustments substantially altered the pattern of sex- and country-related differences in tests involving body mass displacement, whereas they had little influence on outcomes primarily reflecting movement speed and coordination. These findings suggest that simple body-size-adjusted indicators may influence the interpretation of physical fitness outcomes in educational and comparative settings.References
American College of Sports Medicine, Ozemek C, Bonikowske AR, Christle JW, Gallo PM, [eds]. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Twelfth edition. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2026.
Morais JFE, Larrière O, Bragada JAA, Bartolomeu RFB, Magalhães PM, Schnegg A, et al. Comparative analysis of physical fitness and body composition in first-year bachelor sports sciences students from France and Portugal. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2025;17(1): 315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01359-0
Cepková A, Cepka R, Šooš Ľ, Honz O, Uvaček M, Žiška J, et al. Cluster analysis as an effective tool for identifying physical fitness in students: the basis for an innovative approach to optimizing physical education in the university environment. Frontiers in Physiology, 2025;16: 1634125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1634125
Hughes DC, Ellefsen S, Baar K. Adaptations to Endurance and Strength Training. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2017;8(6): a029769. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029769
Grgic J. Test–retest reliability of the EUROFIT test battery: a review. Sport Sciences for Health, 2022;19(2): 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00936-x
Kyrychenko V, Deak Gf, Pop Nh, Gomboș L, Andrieieva O, Khrypko I. Comparative Analysis of Physical Fitness of Physical Education Major Romanian and Ukrainian Students. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, 2023: 5–19. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.68(3).19
Deak GF, Kyrychenko V, Pop NH, Khurtenko O, Zhovtenko Y, Pidhaina V, et al. Clustering undergraduate students enrolled in physical education majors in Romania and Ukraine based on their physical fitness levels. J Phys Educ Sport. 2025;25(1):167–74. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2025.01019
Bonilla DA, Sánchez-Rojas IA, Mendoza-Romero D, Moreno Y, Kočí J, Gómez-Miranda LM, et al. Profiling Physical Fitness of Physical Education Majors Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022;20(1): 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010146
López-Sánchez G, Radzimiński Ł, Skalska M, Jastrzębska J, Smith L, Wakuluk D, et al. Body Composition, Physical Fitness, Physical Activity and Nutrition in Polish and Spanish Male Students of Sports Sciences: Differences and Correlations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019;16(7): 1148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071148
Kung YT, Chang CM, Hwang FM, Chi SC. The Association between Body Mass Index and Physical Fitness of Normal Weight/Overweight/Obese University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020;17(15): 5391. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155391
Guo T, Shen S, Yang S, Yang F. The relationship between BMI and physical fitness among 7451 college freshmen: a cross-sectional study in Beijing, China. Frontiers in Physiology, 2024;15: 1435157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1435157
Li Y, Shi N, Tao Y. Associations between body mass index and health-related physical fitness among Chinese university students: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2025;7: 1638381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1638381
Kochman M, Kasperek W, Guzik A, Drużbicki M. Body Composition and Physical Fitness: Does This Relationship Change in 4 Years in Young Adults?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022;19(3): 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031579
Crewther BT, McGuigan MR, Gill ND. The Ratio and Allometric Scaling of Speed, Power, and Strength in Elite Male Rugby Union Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2011;25(7): 1968–1975. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e4f77c
van Valkengoed DW, Krekels EHJ, Knibbe CAJ. All You Need to Know About Allometric Scaling: An Integrative Review on the Theoretical Basis, Empirical Evidence, and Application in Human Pharmacology. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2024;64(2): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01444-6
Wasiluk A, Kyrychenko V, Deak GF, Saczuk J, Wilczewski R. Anthropometric and physical fitness differences between Polish and Romanian physical education students: a sex-specific perspective. Pol J Sport Tourism. 2026; 33(2), 43–49.
Wasiluk A, Kyrychenko V, Deak GF, Wilczewski R. Limited Association Between Body Mass Index and Selected Components of Physical Fitness in Higher Education Physical Education Students: A Sex- and Country-Specific Analysis. Sports, 2026;14(5): 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14050167
Cruz-León C, Expósito-Carrillo P, Sánchez-Parente S, Jiménez-Iglesias J, Borges-Cosic M, Cuenca-Garcia M, et al. Feasibility and Safety of Field-Based Physical Fitness Tests: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine - Open, 2025;11(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00799-1
Nevill AM, de Castro Silveira JF, Gaya AR, Reuter CP, Del Corona Lorenzi T, Silva G, et al. The dangers of predicting ratio standards using multiple regression: A case study using the ratio standard VO2peak (ml·kg−1·min−1). Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2026;29(1): 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.08.002
NEVILL AM, TOMKINSON GR, LANG JJ, WUTZ W, MYERS TD. How Should Adult Handgrip Strength Be Normalized? Allometry Reveals New Insights and Associated Reference Curves. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2021;54(1): 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002771
Marin‐Jimenez N, Perez‐Bey A, Cruz‐Leon C, Conde‐Caveda J, Segura‐Jimenez V, Castro‐Piñero J, et al. Criterion‐related validity and reliability of the standing long jump test in adults: The Adult‐Fit project. European Journal of Sport Science, 2024;24(9): 1379–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12182
Zemková E, Štefániková GK. Age- and gender-related differences in explosive leg muscle function with respect to jump tests used: a comparative study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2025;17(1): 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01296-y
Giuriato M, Lovecchio N, Vandoni M, Gatti A, Nevill AM. Stature is the key: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of stature and body mass in physical fitness through allometric modeling. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2026;29(2): 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.09.003
Prieto-González P. Relationship between Specific Field-Based Physical Fitness Test Results and Selected Health Biomarkers in College-Aged Males: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022;19(21): 14498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114498
Wu H, Lin P, Zeng G, Chen F. Associations between body mass index and physical fitness indicators among Chinese university students: a multicenter cross-sectional study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2024;16(1): 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-01024-y
Kukić F, Orr R, Marković M, Dawes JJ, Čvorović A, Koropanovski N. Factorial and Construct Validity of Sit-Up Test of Different Durations to Assess Muscular Endurance of Police Students. Sustainability, 2022;14(20): 13630. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013630
Council of Europe. Eurofit: Handbook for the Eurofit Tests of Physical Fitness. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Committee for the Development of Sport; 1988
Mack-Inocentio D, Menai M, Doré E, Doreau B, Gaillard C, Finaud J, et al. Large-Scale Assessment of Health-Related Physical Fitness in French Older Adults: Feasibility and Validity. Frontiers in Public Health, 2020;8: 487308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.487308
Downloads
Received
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agnieszka Wasiluk, Viktoriia Kyrychenko, Grațiela-Flavia Deak, Robert Wilczewski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Holder - Author(s). more
Abstract views: 44 / PDF downloads: 15
