Interaction of integral parameters of physical state and biological age of students aged 17-19 years old in the process of adaptation to standard and experimental physical education programs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0209

Keywords:

students, gender, physical education, biological age, physical state, mutual influence

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The process of adaptation to physical education programs is a critical factor influencing the health and physical development of students. Understanding how these programs affect both the physical state and biological age of students can significantly improve their effectiveness. The aim of the study is to investigate the interaction between integral parameters of physical state (PS) and biological age (BA) of students aged 17-19 years old in the process of adaptation to standard and experimental physical education (PE) programs. Material and Methods. The study involved 140 first-year students of the National University of Telecommunications - 80 males and 60 females. In the course of the research, the indices of functional state, physical fitness (PF) and physical development (PD), biological age (BA) were recorded in young men and women of the control (CG) and experimental (EG) groups. To process the experimental material, methods of dispersion and canonical analysis were used and multiple correlation and determination coefficients were calculated. Results. It was revealed that the impact of PS integral parameters on students' BA is stronger than the inverse influence of BA on PS parameters. The degree of BA reduction under the influence of the studied factors is most pronounced in the EG of girls and boys. The variability of the group of PD and PF indices is accompanied by the variability of most of the BA parameters’ dispersion in all studied groups of students. The factor of gender has the greatest impact on the BA of students. Girls have lower initial values of BA and it’s a more pronounced decrease by the end of the experiment. The effectiveness of the impact of an aerobically oriented experimental program on the improvement of students’ PS and reduction of BA was confirmed. Under the influence of the experimental program, the BA of EG girls decreases to a greater extent in comparison with EG boys and students of both control groups. Changes and differences in BA of boys and girls of EG and CG are due to the combined impact of the factor of PE software and that of adaptation changes of students' PS in the annual process of PE. In the group of boys and girls more pronounced influence on BA in the course of the experiment was produced by the factor of software and adaptation changes, respectively. Conclusions. The gender factor has the strongest impact on students' BA - girls have lower initial values of BA and it’s a more pronounced decrease by the end of the experiment in comparison with boys. Adaptation changes of PS in the process of software implementation are accompanied by a decrease in BA in the experimental groups. One of the criteria and confirmations of the effectiveness of the developed PE program is the degree of mutual influence of PS integral parameters, which is most pronounced in the reduction of BA in the experimental groups of girls and boys.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Pryimakov, University of Szczecin

sanaol7.alex@gmail.com; Faculty of Physical Culture and Health Promotion (Szczecin, Poland); Faculty of Physical Culture and Health, Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University (Kyiv, Ukraine).

Marek Sawczuk, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport

Marek.Sawczuk@usz.edu.pl; Division of Molecular Biology, Department of Health and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Physical Culture; Gdansk, Poland.

Stanislav Prysiazhniuk, NDUU The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

stas046@ukr.net; Kyiv, Ukraine.

Georgiy Korobeynikov, National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport

k.george.65.w@gmail.com; Department of Theory and Methodology of International Wrestling, Uzbek State University of Physical Education and Sports (Tashkent region, Chirchik, Uzbekistan);  (Kyiv, Ukraine).

Nataliya Mazurok, University of Szczecin

natprim75@gmail.com; Faculty of Physical Culture and Health Promotion (Szczecin, Poland); Faculty of Physical Culture and Health, Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University (Kyiv, Ukraine).

References

Prysiazhniuk S, Tolubko V, Oleniev D, Parczevskyy Y, Prontenko K, Griban G, et al. The influence of physical activities on biological age parameters of the first-year female students from the special medical department. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2018;18(2):561–564. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.02081

Pryimakov O, Sawczuk M, Tymoshenko O, Mazurok N. Model characteristics of the structure and interrelations of integral parameters of students’ physical condition. Physical Education of Students, 2023;27(5):279–293. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0508

Chainikov PN, Cherkasova VG. Biological age and age changes rate in athletes of playing kinds of sport and untrained persons. Perm Medical Journal, 2017;34(1):95–99.

Razmahova SY, Timofeeva OV, Epp TI. Assessment of the biological age of full-time and part-time students. Tomsk State University Journal, 2023;(486): 221–227. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/486/24

Korol SA. Assessment of physical health and physical fitness of students of technical specialties of I course. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 2014;11:23–29. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2014.1105

Sazanov AV, Sazanov ML, Demina NL, Popova GA. Assessment of the level of physical health and adaptive capabilities of freshmen of a humanitarian university. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2015;5:100-105.

Apanasenko GL, Havruliuk V. Biological degradation of HOMO SAPIENS: ways of counteraction. Basics. Concepts. Methods. Palmarium Academic Publishing; 2014. (In Russian).

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2020; 4(1):23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30323-2

Bazilevich N. Optimizing physical education of students using crossfit. InterConf, 2021; (55): 353–371. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.7-8.05.2021.038 (In Ukrainian).

Dao Chanh T. The influence of physical activities on biological age parameters of females from 17 to 18 years old. Journal of Sports Medicine and Therapy, 2018;3(3): 075–079. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jsmt.1001030

Rebelo-Marques A, De Sousa Lages A, Andrade R, Ribeiro CF, Mota-Pinto A, Carrilho F, et al. Aging Hallmarks: The Benefits of Physical Exercise. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2018;9: 258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00258

Elhakeem A, Murray ET, Cooper R, Kuh D, Whincup P, Hardy R. Leisure-time physical activity across adulthood and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease at age 60-64: A prospective cohort study. Atherosclerosis, 2018;269:279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.11.019

Arefiev V, Tymoshenko O, Malechko T, Domina Z, Bezkopylny O, Dutchak Y, et al. Methodology of Differentiation of Health-Improving Classes in Physical Education for Primary School Students. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 2020;9(7): 134–143.

Parsons N, Griffin XL, Achten J, Chesser TJ, Lamb SE, Costa ML. Modelling and estimation of health-related quality of life after hip fracture: A re-analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0199

Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, Berrington De Gonzalez A, Park Y, Katki HA, et al. Leisure Time Physical Activity of Moderate to Vigorous Intensity and Mortality: A Large Pooled Cohort Analysis. Khaw KT (ed.) PLoS Medicine, 2012;9(11): e1001335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335

Garatachea N, Pareja-Galeano H, Sanchis-Gomar F, Santos-Lozano A, Fiuza-Luces C, Morán M, et al. Exercise Attenuates the Major Hallmarks of Aging. Rejuvenation Research, 2015;18(1): 57–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2014.1623

Voitenko VP. Health of the healthy. Introduction to Sanology. Кyiv: Health; 1991. (In Russian).

Belozerova LM. The biological age determination by blood test. Clinical Gerontology, 2006;12(3):50–52.

Zhong X, Lu Y, Gao Q, Nyunt MSZ, Fulop T, Monterola CP, et al. Estimating Biological Age in the Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2020;75(10):1913–1920. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz146

Sindeeva LB, Nikolaev VG, Kochetova TF, Kovrigina OA. Component composition of the body as a criteria of biological age. Siberian Medical Review, 2015;5:61–65. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.20333/25000136-2015-5-61-66

Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, Cohen HJ, Corcoran DL, Danese A, et al. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015;112(30). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506264112

Govorukhin AA, Mushty KA. Effect of sports specialization on body composition and anthropometric data in female students of pedagogical universities. Human Sport Medicine, 2020;20(4): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.14529/hsm200403

Pryimakov O, Sawczuk M, Prysiazhniuk S, Mazurok N, Petrachkov O. Interrelations of physical state parameters and biological age of students in the process of physical education. Physical Education of Students, 2024;28(1):16–28. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0102

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 2013;310:2191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Timoshenko OV, Ievtushok MV, Malenko LV, Nikol's'kij AV. Regulation on the Organization of Physical Education and Mass Sports at National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Kyiv; 2022. (In Ukrainian).

Borovikov VP. A popular introduction to modern data analysis in STATISTICA. Methodology and technology of modern data analysis. Moscow: Goryachaya Liniya-Telecom; 2018.

Kolokoltsev M, Romanova E, Vorozheikin, Bochar I, Karuzin K, Martusevich A, et al. The effect of physical activity on biological age and body composition in 18–19-year-old girls. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2022;22(4):981–987. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.04125

Kang YG, Suh E, Lee J woo, Kim DW, Cho KH, Bae CY. Biological age as a health index for mortality and major age-related disease incidence in Koreans: National Health Insurance Service Health screening 11-year follow-up study. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2018; 13: 429–436. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S157014

Levine ME. Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(6):667–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls233

Mozolev O. Monitoring of the physical health state among 16-17-year-old female students. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 2021;13(3): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.13.3.06

Pavanello, Campisi, Tona, Lin, Iliceto. Exploring Epigenetic Age in Response to Intensive Relaxing Training: A Pilot Study to Slow Down Biological Age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019;16(17): 3074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173074

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Pryimakov O, Sawczuk M, Prysiazhniuk S, Korobeynikov G, Mazurok N. Interaction of integral parameters of physical state and biological age of students aged 17-19 years old in the process of adaptation to standard and experimental physical education programs. Physical Education of Students. 2024;28(2):120-33. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0209
Statistics

Abstract views: 1489 / PDF downloads: 514

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>