Evaluation of a body height and weight harmony among university students

Keywords: physical education, bachelor, body composition, BMI, modelling

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. A harmony between the body weight and height is one of the most important sign of the right body composition. The aim of this research was to compare objective and subjective evaluations of the body weight and height correlation by university students. Material and Methods. Students of three years Bachelor programs in the humanistic university were investigated: 137 males in the age of 22.1±1.7 years old, body height – 180.0±7.9 cm, body weight – 79.6±12.3 kg; 281 females in the age of 21.5±2.1 years old, body height – 166.4±6.0 cm, body weight – 59.6±8.9 kg. During the lessons of Physical Education, students were asked to evaluate mentally their body weight value using three categories: normal, overweight, and underweight. A body weight value was evaluated using BMI model too. Correlation between results of these two evaluations was determined using the Pearson interclass correlation coefficient. Results. One way ANOVA showed relatively small differences between BMI values of three studied groups: (p=0.235). Within groups variation was in the medium interval: from V=11.4% in the Nursing group up to 16.6% – in the Physical Education group. Totally for all the participants, Pearson interclass correlation showed moderate significant correlation (r=0.354, p<0.001) between results of the objective as BMI values and subjective evaluations as data received from a special questionnaire. Conclusions. Comparison of the objective evaluation results of body weight by BMI and results of subjective evaluation regarding the body weight were compared vs. results evaluated mentally by students. Subjective evaluated results very good met results obtained from BMI values. Corresponding error appeared negligible small. Statistical hypothesis regarding a common general population these two samples was accepted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 128 | PDF Downloads: 61 |

Author Biographies

Stanislaw B. Nowak, Technological and Humanistic University named after Kasimerz Pulaski
snowak@uthrad.pl; Technological and Humanistic University named after Kasimerz Pulaski; Radom, Poland.
Ihor P. Zanevskyy, Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Boberskyj
izanevsky@ukr.net; Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Boberskyj; Lviv, Ukraine.

References

1. Subak E, Kaya K, Viga SO, Ocak MH, Agaoglu C, Bekiroglu A. Association between body composition, physical activity level and Illinois agility test performance in young males and females. Physical Education of Students, 2022; 26(4):191–198.
https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2022.0404

2. Duarte LS, Chinen MNK, Fujimori E. Distorted self-perception and dissatisfaction with body image among nursing students. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021;55:e03665.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2019042903665

3. Cleveland Clinic. Anorexia Nervosa [Internet]. Cleveland: USA 2022 [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9794-anorexia-nervosa

4. Kodua M, Mackenzie JM, Smyth N. Nursing assistants' experiences of administering manual restraint for compulsory nasogastric feeding of young persons with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2020; 29 (6): 1181–1191.
https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12758

5. Radwan H, Hasan HA, Ismat H, et al. Body Mass Index Perception, Body Image Dissatisfaction and Their Relations with Weight-Related Behaviors among University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(9):1541.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091541

6. Wojtowicz E, Duda-Biernacka B. BMI of students of School of Sport – facts and self-assessment in the context of physical activity and parents’ education. Long-standing research. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2017;9(1):55–62.
https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.09.1.06

7. Ayran G, Suleyman Z, Avcı U, Arık U. The effect of Internet addiction on eating attitude and body image in university students. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2021;34(3):199–205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12320

8. Tayhan Kartal F, Yabancı Ayhan N. Relationship between eating disorders and internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Eat Weight Disord. 2021;26(6):1853–1862.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01027-x

9. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [Internet]. Helsinki: WMA; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 6]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

10. Lohman TG, Milliken LA. Editors. ACSM's Body Composition Assessment Ebook With CE Exam. Champaign (Il.): Human Kinetics; 2020.

11. Weir JP, Vincent WJ. Statistics in Kinesiology. 5th Edition. Champaign, Il.: Human Kinetics; 2021.

12. Zanevskyy I, Zanevska L. Intraclass correlation test-score reliability of a single trial. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2017; 45(3): 1073–1080.
https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20150485

13. Brady CJ, Harrison AJ, Comyns TM. A review of the reliability of biomechanical variables produced during the isometric mid-thigh pull and isometric squat and the reporting of normative data. Sports Biomechanics, 2020; 19(1):1–25.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1452968

14. Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju S, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, Berrington de Gonzalez A, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet, 2016; 388 (10046): 776–786.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1

15. Caleyachetty R, Barber TM, Mohammed NI, Cappuccio FP, Hardy R, Mathur R, et al. Ethnicity-specific BMI cutoffs for obesity based on type 2 diabetes risk in England: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2021; 9 (7): 419–426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00088-7

16. Wright RR, Perkes JL, Schaeffer C, Woodruff JB, Waldrip K, et al. Investigating BMI Discrepancies in Subjective and Objective Reports among College Students. J Hum Health Res, 2018;1: 106.

17. Wilson OWA, Bopp CM, Papalia Z, Bopp M. Objective vs self‐report assessment of height, weight and body mass index: Relationships with adiposity, aerobic fitness and physical activity. Clinical Obesity. 2019;9(5).
https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12331

18. Radwan H, Hasan HA, Najm L, Zaurub S, Jami F, Javadi F, Deeb LA, Iskandarani A. Eating disorders and body image concerns as influenced by family and media among university students in Sharjah, UAE. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(3):695–700.
https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.062017.10

19. Haakstad LAH, Stensrud T, Gjestvang C. Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8502.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168502

20. Shoham DA, Hammond R, Rahmandad H, Wang Y, Hovmand P. Modeling Social Norms and Social Influence in Obesity. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 2015; 2: 71–79.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-014-0032-2

21. Kalka E, Pastuszak A, Busko K. Secular trends in body height, body weight, BMI and fat percentage in Polish university students in a period of 50 years. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220514.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220514

22. Nagel G, Wabitsch M, Galm C, Berg S, Brandstetter S, Fritz M, et al. Secular changes of anthropometric measures for the past 30 years in South-West Germany. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009; 63: 1440–1443.

23. Papadimitriou A, Fytanidis G, Papadimitriou DT, Priftis KN, Nicolaidou P, Fretzayas A. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in young Greek men. Obes Rev 2008; 9: 100–103.

24. Maukonen M.; Mannisto S, Tolonen H. A comparison of measured versus self-reported anthropometrics for assessing obesity in adults: A literature review. Scand. J. Public Health 2018; 46: 565–579.

25. Hodge JM, Shah R, McCullough ML, Gapstur SM, Patel AV. Validation of self-reported height and weight in a large, nationwide cohort of U.S. adults. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231229.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231229

26. Flegal KM, Ogden CL, Fryar C, Afful J, Klein R, Huang DT. Comparisons of Self-Reported and Measured Height and Weight, BMI, and Obesity Prevalence from National Surveys: 1999–2016. Obesity. 2019;27: 1711–1719.
https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22591

27. Souza AC, Alvarenga MS. Body dissatisfaction among university students – An integrative review. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2016;65(3):286–99.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000134

28. Silva WR, Dias JCR, Maroco J, Campos JADB. Factors that contribute to the body image concern of female college students. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;18(4):785–97.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500040009

29. Boutahar K, Chetoui A, Kaoutar K, Najimi M, Chigr F. Anthropometric status and body image perception among Moroccan university students. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2019;67(5):311–317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2019.04.057

30. Divecha CA, Simon MA, Asaad AA, Tayyab H. Body Image Perceptions and Body Image Dissatisfaction among Medical Students in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022;22(2):218–224.
https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.8.2021.121

31. Lin CJ, DeRoo LA, Jacobs SR, Sandler DP. Accuracy and reliability of self-reported weight and height in the Sister Study. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15: 989–999.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980011003193

32. Wu R, Zhu B, Chen R, Chen L, Chen R, Zhu D. Weight Perception Measured by Verbal Descriptions and Visual Descriptions: Which Measurement Correlates with Weight Loss Intentions among Female Nursing Students? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5200.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105200

33. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, et al. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13–27.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1614362
Published
2022-12-28
How to Cite
1.
Nowak S, Zanevskyy I. Evaluation of a body height and weight harmony among university students. Physical Education of Students. 2022;26(6):325-31. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2022.0607
Section
Articles