Improving university students’ coordinating skills in physical education lessons with basketball focus




coordination skills, basketball, female students, test battery


Background and Study Aim. The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of a 14-week intervention in improving coordination skills among female university students. The intervention consisted in physical education lessons with basketball focus, the final practical outcome being to practice a coherent and satisfying game for the players. Material and Methods. The research was carried out on a group of 15 female university students aged 19-20, in the second semester of the academic year 2018-2019, lasted 14 weeks, with a frequency of 1 lesson per week. The applied tests were dynamic balance, body coordination, hands coordination, basketball spot shooting, wall passes. Measurements were performed before intervention as a baseline and after it to record the effect size. The manipulated variable was a physical exercises program designed in purpose to produce an effect on the dependent variable: coordination skills improvement. The significant mean difference and the effect size was statistically demonstrated with student t-test p <0.005. Results. From the statistical data obtained, we found that the results of ‘before and after’ tests differ significantly. For all the parameters under discussion the effect magnitude was large and mostly very large, also the research hypothesis was accepted. Conclusions. Applying the designed program has led to a substantial improvement of coordinating skills and has positively influenced the effectiveness of the basketball technique learning process.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cristina I. Nae, Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Lecturer, Doctor of Sciences in Physical Education and Sport;; Department of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest University of Economic Studies; Bucharest, Romania.

Cristiana L. Pop, Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Professor, Doctor of Sciences in Physical Education and Sport;; Department of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest University of Economic Studies; Bucharest, Romania. 


1. Kimura A, Yokozawa T, Ozaki H. Clarifying the Biomechanical Concept of Coordination Through Comparison with Coordination in Motor Control. Front. Sports Act. Living. 2021; 14 (3):753062.
2. Grigore V, Mitrache G, Predoiu R, Rosca R. Characteristic of instrumental movement-eye hand coordination in sports, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2021;33:193–197.
3. Moanță A. Physical Training in the Basketball Game. Bucharest: Pro; 2000. (In Romanian).
4. Nae IC. The technique of playing basketball in physical education lessons in higher education. Bucharest: ASE; 2010. (In Romanian).
5. Schnabel G, Meinel K. Theory of movement: synthesis of a theory of motor sports under the pedagogical aspect. Buenos Aires: Stadium; 1987.
6. Hirtz P. Objectives, means and methods of coordination improvement. Italy: Athletics; 1986.
7. Blume DD. Identification of coordinative skills and capabilities, their development. Wissenschaftliche Zeitzchrift der DHfK, 1981; 3: 17–41.
8. Manno R. Motor skills. The Romanian Sports Scientific Society; 1982.
9. Weineck J. Manuel d’entrainement [Training manual]. Paris: Vigot; 1986. (In French).
10. Dragnea A. Theoretical and methodical sports training. Bucharest: FEST; 1999.
11. Colibaba ED, Bota I. Sports games, theory and methodology. Bucharest: Aldin; 1998.
12. Bompa TO. Development of biomotor qualities. Constanta: Ponto; 2001.
13. Baştiurea E. Handball. Concepts, principles, and ways to improve training. Galati: Academica; 2007.
14. Peper CE, Betteco JB, Harjo JP, Peter J. B. Interlimb coupling strength scales with movement amplitude. Journal of Neuroscience letters, 2008; 437:10–14.
15. Baştiurea E, Stan Z, Rizescu C, Mihăilă I, Andronic F. The effect of muscle strength on the capacity of coordination in handball, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014; 137: 3–10.
16. Hantău C. Volleyball - Basic theoretical notions, Bucharest: A.S.E.; 2014.
17. Reijo B, Caroline N, Pavoo VK, Vesa L. Adaptive changes in motor control of rhythmic movement after maximal eccentric actions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2009; 19: 347–356.
18. Lopez Bernal JA, Andrews N, Amirthalingam G. The Use of Quasi-experimental Designs for Vaccine Evaluation. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2019;68:1769–76.
19. Limanskaya O, Yefimova O, Kriventsova I, Wnorowski K, Bensbaa A. The coordination abilities development in female students based on dance exercises. Physical Education of Students. 2021;25(4):249–56.
20. Nagovitsyn RS, Osipov AYu, Manurov IM, Zhuikov RA, Vershinina NB. Adaptation of foreign female students to physical activity based on the dexterity development. Physical Education of Students, 2019;23(2):70–74.
21. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2012;4:279–82.
22. Nae IC. Theoretical and practical aspects regarding forming representative university basketball teams. Marathon, 2019;11 (2): 92–97.
23. Radaeva SV, Bezhentseva LM, Sosunovsky VS. The Use of Choreographic Exercises for the Development of the Conditioning and Coordination Abilities of Female University Students. Tomsk State University Journal, 2021;465:172–178.




How to Cite

Nae CI, Pop CL. Improving university students’ coordinating skills in physical education lessons with basketball focus. Physical Education of Students. 2022;26(1):41-7.

Abstract views: 457 / PDF downloads: 305