The relationship between leisure satisfaction, physical activity level and healthy life-style behaviors of sport science students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Keywords: sport science students, leisure satisfaction, healthy life-style behaviors, physical activity

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The purpose of the study was to determine the relationship between leisure satisfaction, physical activity levels and healthy life-style behaviors of sport science students during the COVID-19 pandemic in distance education. Material and Methods. In total, 218 sport science students participated in this study voluntarily. The short form of International Physical Activity Questionnaire was administered for the determination of physical activity level of distance education students. Their physical activity levels were categorized as inactive, minimally active, and physically active by using Metabolic Equivalent Term method. Health-promoting Life-style Profile Questionnaire was used with self-actualization, health responsibility, exercise, nutrition, interpersonal support, and stress management subscales. The leisure satisfaction scale was administered for the determination of leisure satisfaction. Results. Results of Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Analyses indicated that there were positive significant correlations between “HLSB” and three sub-dimensions of “IPAQ” (MIA, VIA and Total). It was found positive correlation between “HLSB” and all sub-dimensions of “LSS” (Psychological, Educational, Social, Relaxation, Physiological and Aesthetical). Also, a significant positive correlation was found between four sub-dimensions of “LSS” (Social, Relaxation, Physiological and Aesthetical) and one sub-dimensions of “IPAQ” (W). It was observed that one sub-dimensions of “LSS” which is “Aesthetical”, and a positive correlation between all sub-dimensions of “IPAQ” was found. Conclusions. The findings of the present study indicated that healthy life-style behaviors were indicators of LSS and IPAQ and also aesthetical was found between IPAQ of sport science students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 252 | PDF Downloads: 156 |

Author Biographies

Ali Özkan, Bartin University
ali_ozkan1@hotmail.com; Bartin University, Bartın, Turkey.
Fatih Yaşartürk, Bartın University
fatihyasarturk@gmail.com; Bartin University; Bartın, Turkey.
Gürkan Elçi, Bartin University
gelci@bartin.edu.tr; Bartin University; Bartın, Turkey.

References

1. Ebem Z. Health promoting behaviors and exercise stages of change levels of students at transition to university. Ankara: Middle East Technical University Social Sciences Institute; 2007.

2. Çimen S. Developing “health risk behaviours scale” in adolescents between 15 and 18 years old. Istanbul: Istanbul University; 2003.

3. Yalçınkaya M, Özer FG, Karamanoğlu AY. Evaluation of healthy lifestyle behaviors in health care workers. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 2007; 6: 409–20.

4. Esin MN. Evaluation and promotion of health behaviors of industry workers. Istanbul: Istanbul University Health Science Institute; 1997.

5. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, King AC. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the centers for disease control and prevention and the american college of sports medicine. JAMA, 1995; 273(5): 402– 407.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520290054029

6. Pitta F, Troosters T, Probst V, Spruit M, Decramer M, Gosselink R. Quantifying physical activity in daily life with questionnaires and motion sensors in COPD. European Respiratory Journal, 2006; 27(5): 1040– 407.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520290054029

7. Montoye HJ. Introduction: evaluation of some measurements of physical activity and energy expenditure. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000; 32(9): 439– 441.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200009001-00001

8. Bozkuş T, Türkmen M, Kul M, Özkan A, Öz Ü, Cengiz C. Determination and relationships of physical activity level and healthy lifestyle behaviors in physical education students. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport (IntJSCS), 2013; 1(3): 49–65.

9. Maugeri G, Castrogiovanni P, Battaglia G, Pippi R, D'Agata V, Palma A, Musumeci G. The impact of physical activity on psychological health during Covid-19 pandemic in Italy. Heliyon, 2020; 6(6): 15– 25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04315

10. Gürbüz B, Karaküçük S. Leisure Constraints Scale-28: scale development, validity and reliability study, Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2007; 12(1): 3–10.

11. Henderson KA, Bialeschki MD. Leisure and active lifestyles: research reflections. Leisure Sciences, 2007; 27(5): 355– 365.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400500225559

12. Aitchison C. Gender and leisure: social and culturel perspectives. London: Routledge; 2003.

13. Gürbüz B. The conception and perception of leisure in Turkey. Champaign, IL, Sagamore Publishing: Henderson K & Sivan A; 2017.

14. Beard JG, Ragheb MG. Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 1980; 12(1): 20– 33.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1980.11969416

15. Siegenthaler KL, O'Dell I. Meeting the leisure needs of families. Journal of Parks and Recreation, 1998; 33(12): 38–43.

16. Du Cap MC. The perceived impact of the acadia advantage program on the leisure lifestyle and leisure satisfation of the students at Acadia University. Ottowa: Acadia University; 2002.

17. Wang EST, Chen LSL, Lin JYC, Wang MCH. The relationship between leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction of adolescents concerning online games. Adolescence, 2008; 43(169): 177–184.

18. Siegenthaler KL, O'Dell I. Leisure attitude, leisure satisfaction, and perceived freedom in leisure within family dyads. Leisure Sciences, 2000; 22(4): 281– 296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409950202302

19. Iso-Ahola SE, Weissinger E. Perceptions of boredom in leisure: conceptualization, reliability, and validity of the leisure boredom scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 1990; 22(1): 1– 17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1990.11969811

20. Choi S, Yoo, Y. Leisure attitude and satisfaction with leisure and life: proposing leisure prioritization and justification, World Leisure Journal, 2017; 59(2): 140– 155.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2016.1216886

21. Lee B, Zhang A. Women’s leisure and leisure satisfaction in contemporary urban China. World Leisure Journal, 2010; 52(3): 211– 221.
https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2010.9728284

22. Hribernik J, Mussap AJ. Leisure satisfaction and subjective wellbeing. Annals of Leisure Research, 2010; 13(4): 701– 708.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2010.9686871

23. Pearson QM. Job satisfaction, leisure satisfaction, and psychological health. The Career Development Quarterly, 1998; 46(4): 416– 426.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1998.tb00718.x

24. Beard JG, Ragheb MG. Measuring leisure interests, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 1992; 10(2): 1–13.

25. Hawkins BA, Ardovino P, Rogers NB, Foose A, Olsen N. Leisure assessment inventory. Ravensdale, WA: Idyll Arbor; 2002.

26. Gökçe H, Orhan K. Validity and reliability study of the leisure satisfaction scale (LSS) into Turkish, Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 2011; 22(4): 139–145.

27. Erkuş A. Bilimsel araştırma sarmalı [Scientific research spiral]. 7th ed. Ankara: Seçkin Bookstore; 2021 (In Turkish).

28. Alpar R. Spor bilimlerinde uygulamalı istatistik [Applied statistics in sports sciences]. Ankara: Nobel Bookstore; 2001 (In Turkish).

29. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. Health promotion life-style profile development psychometrics. Nursing Research, 1987; 36: 76– 80.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002

30. Walker SN, Hill-Polerecky DM. Psychometric evaluation of the health promotion life-style profile. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Medical Center; 1987.

31. Akça S. Evaluation of health behaviors among lecturers and of affecting factors. İzmir: Ege University Health Science Institute; 1998.

32. Craig CA, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine Science Sports Exercise, 2003; 35(8): 1381– 1395.
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

33. IPAQ research committee Guidelines for data processing and analysis of International Physical Activity Questionnaire [online], Retrieved on 5 August 2020 [cited by 2021 Feb 15] Available from: http://www.ipaq.ki.se

34. Öztürk M. A research on reliability and validity of international physical activity questionnaire and determination of physical activity level in university students. Ankara: Hacettepe University Health Science Institute; 2005.

35. Özkan A, Köklü Y, Kayıhan G, Alemdaroğlu U, Ersöz G. The role of physical activity and exercise in prevention and treatment of obesity. SSTB International Refereed Academic Journal of Sports, Health and Medical Sciences, 2013; 3(7): 48–63.

36. Ay S, Yanıkkerem E, Çalım SI, Yazıcı M. Health-promoting lifestyle behavior for cancer prevention: a survey of turkish university students. APJCP, 2012; 13: 2269– 2277.
https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.5.2269

37. Knechtle B. Influence of physical activity on mental well-being and psychiatric disorders. Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis, 2004; 93(35): 1403– 1411.
https://doi.org/10.1024/0369-8394.93.35.1403

38. Macauley E. Physical Activity and Psychosocial Outcomes. Champagne, Illinois, Human Kinetics: Bouchard C; 1994.

39. Orhan S. The realitonship between physical activity level, body mass index, and body fat percentage in urban and rural elemantry school students. Education Research Review, 2015; 10(1): 69– 74.
https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1916

40. Finn K, Johansen N, Specker B. Factors associated with physical activity in perp school children. Journal of Pediatri, 2002; 140: 81– 85.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2002.120693

41. Özkan A. The relationship between physical activity levels and healthy lifestyle behaviors of distance education students. Educational Research and Reviews, 2015; 10(4): 416– 422.
https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2082

42. Türkmen M. The relationships between gender, physical self-perception, sport experience, motivation orientations and academic success. International Journal of Academic Research Part B, 2013; 5(5): 10– 16.
https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-5/B.10

43. Çelik GO, Malak AT, Bektaş M, Yılmaz D, Yümer AS, Öztürk Z, Demir E. Examination of factors affecting health school student’s health promotion behavior. Anatolian Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2009; 3(3): 164–169.

44. Savcı S, Öztürk M, Arıkan H, İnal İnce D, Tokgözoğlu L. Physical activity levels of university students. Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology, 2006; 34(3): 166–172.

45. Nacar E, Gacar A, Karahüseyinoğlu MF, Gündoğdu C. Analysis for sports facilities in sports high school in terms of quality and quantity (central anatolia region sample). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2013; 7(2): 627–631.

46. Acar K, Yılmaz AK. The relationship between university students' leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction. Physical Education and Sport Sciences Journal, 2021; 15(1): 25–35.

47. Aydın O, Yaşartürk F. Investigation of the relationship between satisfaction and self perception levels of recreational activities of elite level bocce athletes studying in university. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 2021; 9(1): 449– 461.
https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.541627

48. Serdar E, Demirel M. The relationship between perceived stress and leisure satisfaction: example of sports sciences students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2020; 22(3): 54–64.

49. Uluç E, Duman S, Acar H. Examining the impact of free time saturation levels on life saturation of international students studying at the university. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science, 2020; 3(2): 407–419.

50. Yaşartürk F. Analysis of the relationship between the academic self-efficacy and leisure satisfaction levels of university students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2019; 7(3): 106– 115.
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i3.3988

51. Yaşartürk F, Bilgin B. Investigation of free time satisfaction and life satisfaction levels of handball studying in university. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies (IntJCES), 2018; 4(2): 50–60.

52. Doğan M, Elçi G, Gürbüz B. Examination of relationship between leisure satisfaction, leisure boredom and job satisfaction: a research on academicans. The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2019; 17(1): 154–164.

53. Erdemli E, Yaşartürk F. Examination of the relationship between free time satisfaction level and problem solving skills of physical education and sports teacher department students. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 2020; 9(3): 1871– 1882.
https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.605808

54. Cengiz R, Yaşartürk F. Examination of the relationship between fitness participants' service quality and leisure satisfaction levels in gyms. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies (IntJCES), 2020; 6(1): 48–62.

55. Hadi G, Erdem B, Duman E. Investigation of the relationship between leisure time satisfaction levels and dispositional flow states of recreational sports’ participants. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 2021; 32(1): 10–19.

56. Stebbins RA. The idea of leisure. 1st ed. New York: Transaction Publishers; 2011.

57. Karasar N. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing; 2017 (In Turkish).
Published
2021-10-30
How to Cite
1.
Özkan A, Yaşartürk F, Elçi G. The relationship between leisure satisfaction, physical activity level and healthy life-style behaviors of sport science students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physical education of students. 2021;25(5):257-64. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2021.0501
Section
Articles