Examination of lower-upper limb of power and force parameters of elite athletes

Keywords: anaerobic power, extremity, isokinetic force, peak powers


Background and Study Aim. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the power and force parameters of lower and upper extremities of the individual and team athletes who practice different branches. Material and Methods. 32 elite athletes, most of whom are university students, with an average age of 21.16 ± 2.08, who are active in sports, participated in the study. The groups were formed from Boxing and Handball (BG and HG) branches in which the upper extremities are used predominantly and from Taekwondo and Football (TG and FG) branches in which the lower extremities are used predominantly. The anaerobic power values of each individual’s upper and lower extremities were measured by a Monark 894E. The isokinetic force values of dominant arms and legs were measured by a Cybex humac norm device. Results. After examination of the data it was found that the upper extremity power values of BG and HG were significantly higher than TG when the top values of peak powers (PP) were evaluated.  In the evaluations with respect to leg 60°/s and 180°/s extension and flexion; HG and FG was significantly higher than TG in 60°/s extension at PP; HG and FG were significantly indifferent but they were significantly higher than BG and TG in 60°/s flexion at PP. In the comparisons of the groups’ 60°/s and 180°/s extension and flexion values of lower extremities anaerobic power and isokinetic force and lower extremities’ wingate values, a number of positive relations were found between all of the groups. All of the groups were positively related to each other in terms of upper extremities wingate and 60°/s, 180°/s internal and external isokinetic forces.  Conclusions. Both the isokinetic arm force values and arm wingate levels were higher in the branches in which the upper extremities are used predominantly than the branches in which the lower extremities are used predominantly. On the other hand, the difference seen in the upper extremities was not seen in the lower extremities.


Download data is not yet available.

| Abstract views: 62 | PDF Downloads: 28 |

Author Biographies

Samet Aktaş, University of Batman
sametaktas85@hotmail.com; School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Batman; Batman, Turkey.
Oktay Çakmakçı, University of Selcuk
ocakmakci@gmail.com; Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Selcuk; Konya, Turkey.


1. Başer E. Applied sports psychology. BSY Publications; 1985. (In Turkish).

2. Zorba E, Ziyagil M, Erdemli İ: Comparison of Some Physiological Capacity and Anthropometric Structures of Turkish and Russian Boxing National Teams. Gazi University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 1999;1:17–28. (In Turkish).

3. Prentice WE, Voight ML. Techniques in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. McGraw Hill Professional; 2001.

4. Bencke J, Damsgaard R, Sækmose A, Jørgensen P, Jørgensen K, Klausen K: Anaerobic power and muscle strength characteristics of 11 years old elite and non‐elite boys and girls from gymnastics, team handball, tennis and swimming. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2002, 12:171–178.

5. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology: nutrition, energy, and human performance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

6. Özkan A, Köklü Y, Ersöz G. Anaerobic performance and measurement methods. Ankara Offset Printing; 2010. (In Turkish).

7. Mendonça LDM, Bittencourt NFN, Anjos MTSd, Silva AAd, Fonseca ST. Isokinetic muscular assessment of the shoulder joint in athletes from the male under-19 and under-21 Brazilian volleyball teams. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 2010;16:107–111.

8. Bİlge M, Tuncel F. Investigation of the Relationship between Anaerobic Power and Capacity and Body Composition in Handball Players. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2003;8:67–76. (In Turkish).

9. Ustundağ B, Kocahan T, Tortu E, Karaman G, Delİceoğlu G. Investigation of Anaerobic Power and Capacity of Male National Team Athletes in Different Branches. Gaziantep University, Journal of Sport Sciences, 2017; 2:57–65. (In Turkish).

10. Arslan O. Evaluating the anaerobic power values and sprint performances of amateur football players playing in different positions. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Department of Physical Education and Sports; 2010. (In Turkish).

11. Micklewright D, Alkhatib A, Beneke R. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2006; 96:748–751.

12. Kounalakis SN, Bayios IA, Koskolou MD, Geladas ND. Anaerobic capacity of the upper arms in top-level team handball players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2008;3:251–261.

13. Hübner-Wozniak E, Kosmol A, Glaz A, Kusior A. The evaluation of upper limb muscles anaerobic performance of elite wrestlers and boxers. J Sci Med Sports, 2006;7:472–480.

14. Ozan M. Evaluation of anaerobic power with arm and leg wingate tests in athletes. Selcuk University, Institute of Health Sciences, 2013. (In Turkish).

15. Hammami N, Zinoubi B, Hamdi F, Nouri A, Zouita A, Dziri C. Profil isocinétique des muscles du genou chez des taekwondoïstes élites olympiques. Science & Sports, 2013;28:188–195.

16. Kocahan T, Akinoğlu B, Yildirim NÜ. Shoulder and knee joints of Turkey's National Men's Boxing Team Athlete Profile Determination of isokinetic muscle strength. Journal of Physiotherapy Rehabilitation, 2018; 29:37–43. (In Turkish).

17. Kafkas A, Çoksevİm B. The Effect of Isokinetic Exercise Programs on Athletes' Upper and Lower Extremity Muscle Groups. İnönü University. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2014;1:10–21. (In Turkish).

18. Özkan A, Mitat K, Ersöz G. Determining the optimal load Wingate anaerobic power test. (Spormetre) Physical Education and Sport Sciences Journal, 2011;9:1–5. (In Turkish).

19. Franceschini K, Nissola N, Zardo B, Tadielo G, Bonetti L. Isokinetic performance of shoulder external and internal rotators in adolescent male volleyball athletes. International Archives of Medicine, 2016: 9.

20. Aguado-Henche S, de Arce AS, Carrascosa-Sánchez J, Bosch-Martín A, Cristóbal-Aguado S. Isokinetic assessment of shoulder complex strength in adolescent elite synchronized swimmers. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2018;22:968–971.

21. Başpınar Ö. The effect of isokinetic muscle strength on anaerobic power in soccer players. Pamukkale University, Institute of Health Sciences; 2009. (In Turkish).

22. Bozoğlu MS. Relationship between shoulder functional ratio and anaerobic power. Selcuk University, Institute of Health Sciences; 2014. (In Turkish).

23. Ozan M, Kiliç M, Çakmakçı O. Assessment of Anaerobic Power With Arm and Leg Wingate Tests In Athletes. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science.2018;4(3):49–60.

24. Teixeira J, Carvalho P, Moreira C, Carneiro A, Santos R. Muscle strength assessment of knee flexors and extensors. comparative study between basketball, football, handball and volleyball athletes. Int J Sports Sc, 2015;5:192–192.

25. Bamaç B, Çolak T, Özbek A, Çolak S, Cinel Y, Yenigün Ö. Isokinetic performance in elite volleyball and basketball players. Kinesiology: International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology, 2008;40:183–189.

26. Bayios IA, Anastasopoulou E, Sioudris D, Boudolos KD. Relationship between isokinetic strength of the internal and external shoulder rotators and ball velocity in team handball. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2001;41:229–235.

27. Tasiopoulos I, Nikolaidis PT, Tripolitsioti A, Stergioulas A, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Isokinetic characteristics of amateur boxer athletes. Frontiers in Physiology, 2018; 9.

28. Peñailillo L, Espíldora F, Jannas-Vela S, Mujika I, Zbinden-Foncea H. Muscle strength and speed performance in youth soccer players. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2016;50:203–210.
How to Cite
Aktaş S, Çakmakçı O. Examination of lower-upper limb of power and force parameters of elite athletes. Physical education of students. 2020;24(6):340-7. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2020.0606