Individualization of selection and training of female athletes in speed-power athletics from the perspective of gender identity




athletics, athletes, speed-strength indicators, individualization, gender identity, morphogenetic markers, selection


Background and Study Aim. To develop and justify the criteria for morphogenetic markers of speed-power abilities of athletes and the main directions of individualization of the process of their preparation, taking into account the characteristics of the female body. Material and Methods. Using the “2D: 4D” determination methodology, finger proportions were analysed for 126 qualified athletes specializing in speed-strength types (sprinting and hurdling, jumping, shot-putting) of different ages (from 17 to 25 years old). For 13 weeks, eight qualified short-distance student runners were regularly tested using computer strain gauge equipment: 5 masculine and 3 feminine types. The tensodynamograms of the manifestation of the strength of muscle groups carrying the main load in the structure of the sprint run were recorded and processed. Results. It was found that 78% of the examined athletes observed finger proportions close to the "male" proportions. This may indicate their certain masculinization. The technique used for this can be an informative and simple marker to predict a genetic predisposition to the ability of effective performance of speed-power work. It was determined that the same amount of power load causes masculine athletes, runners for short distances, a more significant deployment of long-term adaptation restructuring of masculine athletes, runners for short distances, compared with athletes of a different gender identity. Conclusions. Criteria for the prognostic assessment of speed-power abilities of athletes based on simple biological markers for testing and identification, like finger proportions (2D: 4D), have been developed. For athletes of high qualification who have a gender identity similar to men and a masculine somatotype, it is possible to use adapted male techniques for training.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eugeny Vrublevskiy, Francisk Skorina Gomel State University; Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, prof.;  Francisk Skorina Gomel State University; Sovetskaya Street, 104, Gomel, 246000, Belarus; University of Zielona Góra; Licealna Street, 9, Zielona Góra, 65-417, Poland.

Anatoly Skrypko, State University of Applied Sciences in Kalisz;  Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, prof.; State University of Applied Sciences in Kalisz; Kaszubska Street 13, Kalisz 62-800, Poland.

Ryszard Asienkiewicz, University of Zielona Góra; Doctor of Biological Sciences, prof.;  University of Zielona Góra; Licealna Street, 9, Zielona Góra, 65-417, Poland.


1. Socha T. Methodology to improve educational systems of women's sports training in aspect of sexual dimorphism. [dissertation]. St. Petersburg; 2002. (in Russian)

2. Issurin VB. Training of athletes of the XXI century. Scientific basis and the construction of training. Moscow: Sport; 2016. (in Russian)

3. Platonov VN. The system of training athletes in the Olympic sport. General theory and its practical applications. Kyiv: Olympic literature; 2015. (in Russian)

4. Pound RW. Women in Sport. XIII Olympic Congress. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Olympic Committee; 2009.

5. Kostyuchenko VF, Vrublevskiy EP, Kozhedub MS. Methods of individualized training of athletes in the annual cycle, specializing in sprinting. Scientific notes of the University. P.F. Lesgaft. 2017; 10 (152): 115–121. (in Russian)

6. Wajewski A. Poznawcze i metodyczne problemy sportu kobiet [Cognitive and methodical problems of women’s sport].Warszawa: AWF; 2009. (in Polish)

7. Shakhlina LA-G. Biomedical basis for women’s sports training. Kiev: Naukova Dumka; 2001. (in Russian)

8. Hecht SS, Arendt E. Training the Female Athlete. In: Mountjoy ML, editor. Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2014, P. 1–8.

9. Money J. Sexual dimorphism and homosexual gender. Psychological Bulletin. 1970; 74: 425– 440.

10. Soboleva TS, Sobolev DV. Sporting success among women with different set of sex characteristics. Medicine and Physical Education: Science and Practice, 2020; 2(5): 76–81. (in Russian)

11. Williams CA, Oliver JL, Lloyd RS. Talent development. London; New York: Routledge; 2014.

12. Radzievsky AR, Loza GА, Gashumov AM, Radzievsky PA. Anatomical and physiological characteristics of the female body. Women's sports: collection of proceedings; 1975: 10–34. (in Russian)

13. Levenets SA. Features of the formation of the function of the reproductive system of adolescent girls who regularly engage in sports. [dissertation]. Kharkov; 1980. (in Russian)

14. Collaer M, Hines M. Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 1995; 118: 55–107.

15. Whalen RE. Brain mechanisms controlling sexual behavior. Beach F.A. (ed.) Sexuality in Four Perspectives. Baltimore, London; 1977. P. 215–246.

16. Аnan'ev BG. Sexual Dimorphism and Human Psychophysiological Evolution. Moscow: MSU Publ.; 2001. (In Russian)

17. Krane V. We can be athletic and feminine, but do we want to? Challenging hegemonic femininity in women's sport. Quest, 2001; 53(1): 115–133.

18. Kalinina NА. Hyperandrogenic Disorders of Reproductive System Among Sportswomen. [dissertation]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russian)

19. Moir A. Brain Sex: the Difference Between Men and Woman. Jessel: Indiana University; 2003.

20. Nikityuk BA. The condition of a female organism’s specific functions by going in for sport. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury, 1984; 3: 19–21. (in Russian)

21. Vrublevskiy EР, Kostyuchenko VF. Morphofunctional aspects of the selection and training of athletes in speed-strength types of athletics. Scientific notes of the University. P.F. Lesgaft. 2009; 4: 33–38. (in Russian)

22. Shakhlina LA-G, Chistyakova MA. Gender politics and issues of sexual dimorphism in the practice of modern sports. Sports medicine and physical rehabilitation, 2019; 2: 18–23.

23. Kagan VE. Violation of gender identity. Handbook of Psychology and Psychiatry of childhood and adolescence. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2000. (in Russian)

24. Mitchell JE, Baker LA, Jacklin CN. Masculinity and Femininity in Twin Children: Genetic and Environmental Factors. Child Development, 1989;60:1475.

25. Powell GN. One more time: Do female and male managers differ? Academy of Management Perspectives, 1990; 4(3): 68–75.

26. Royce WS, Gebelt JL, Duff, RW. Female athletes: Being both athletic and feminine. Athletic Insight: The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 2003; 5(1): 47–61.

27. Tarasevich Е, Mulik V, Grashchenkova Zh, Okun D. Gender similarities and gender differences of athletes and sportswomen in cyclic sports, Slobozhansky scientific and sports bulletin, 2020; 2(76): 73–90. (in Ukrainian)

28. Burn S. The social psychology of Gender. Mc Craw Hill, Inc.; 2000.

29. Manning JT, Scutt D. Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. The ratio of 2nd and 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 1998; 13(11): 3000–3004.

30. Manning JT, Bundred PE. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a new predictor of disease predisposition? Medical hypotheses, 2000; 54(5): 855–857.

31. Hönekopp J, Manning JT, Müller C. Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Hormones and Behavior, 2006; 49(4): 545–549.

32. Neyse L, Brañas-Garza P. Digit ratio measurement guide. Kiel working papers, 2014; 1914: 1–11.

33. Oyeyemi BF, Iyiola OA, Oyeyemi AW, Oricha KA, Anifowoshe AT. Alamukii NA. Sexual dimorphism in ratio of second and fourth digits and its relationship with metabolic syndrome indices and cardiovascular risk factors. Journal of research in medical sciences, 2014; 19(3): 234–239.

34. Williams TJ, Pepitone ME, Christensen SE, Cooke BM, Huberman AD, Breedlove NJ, et al. Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature, 2000;404:455–6.

35. Babichev VN. Neuroendocrinology of the sex. Мoscow: Science; 1981. (in Russian)

36. Bem SL. Theory and measurement of androgyny. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 1979; 37: 1047–1054.

37. Vrublevsky EP, Sevdalev SV, Narskin АG, Kozhedub MS. Technology of individualization training of qualified athletes: theoretical and methodological aspects. Gomel: F.Skoruna GSU; 2016. (in Russian)

38. Semenov VG, Vrublevskiy EP. Patterns of adaptive variability in the strength of the muscles of female sprinters in the process of the development of sportsmanship. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury, 2000; 9: 22–24. (in Russian)

39. Kelly GF. Fundamentals of modern sexology. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2000. (in Russian)

40. Viru AA, Kirge PK. Hormones and athletic performance. Moscow: Physical education and sport; 1983. (in Russian)

41. Sutton JR., Coleman MJ, Casey J, Lazarus L. Androgen Responses during Physical Exercise. British Medical Journal, 1973; 1(5852): 520–522.

42. Selye G. At the level of the whole organism. Мoscow: World; 1982. (in Russian)

43. Butovskaya ML. Secrets of gender. The man and the woman in the mirror of evolution. Fryazino: Vek-2; 2004. (in Russian)

44. Barbieri SRL. Hyperandrogenic disorders. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1990; 33: 640–650.

45. Akyol P, Tutkun E, Cebi M. The influence of hand finger length ratio on the motoric and functional dominance of women dancers, athletes and sedentaries. International Journal Of Academic Research, 2016; 8(3): 43–51

46. Chernyshova FA, Kiamova NI, Islamova NM. Finger index of athletes of different levels of sports training. In the world of scientific discovery, 2015; 10.1(7): 360–375. (in Russian)

47. Abramova TF. Finger dermatoglyphics and physical abilities. [dissertation]. Мoscow; 2003. (in Russian)

48. Bescos R. Esteve M, Porta J, Mateu M, Irurtia A, Voracek, M. Prenatal programming of sporting success: Associations of digit ratio (2D:4D), a putative marker of prenatal androgen action, with world rankings in female fencers. Journal of Sports Science. 2009; 27 (6): 625–632.

49. Oladipo GS, Anugweje KC, Jervas K, Amasiatu VC, Ipigansi UN, Enefe G. Second digit length, fourth digit length and second to fourth digit ratio (2D: 4D): Relevance in the choice of female footballer athletes and female non-footballer athletes in Nigeria. Anthropology, 2017; 2(1): 23–28.

50. Tambe MK, Turankar AV, Lingawar S, Dhokane NB, Pophali NP, Kherde PM, Bajaj V. Influence of digit ratio (2D: 4D) on reaction time and athletic sprint performance: A short term pilot study. MedPulse International Journal of Physiology, 2018; 5(2): 17–21.

51. Acar H, Eler N. The relationship of digit ratio (2D: 4D) with cerebral lateralization and grip strength in elite swimmers. Journal of education and training studies, 2018; 6(4): 84–89.

52. Paul SN, Kato BS, Hunkin JL, Vivekanandan S, Spector TD. The big finger: the second to fourth digit ratio is a predictor of sporting ability in women. British journal of sports medicine, 2006; 40(12): 981–983.

53. Kamińska E, Szymańska-Parkieta K. Formaty palcowe u kandydatów i kandydatek do szkoły sportowej [Finger formats for candidates for sports schools]. Katowice: AWF; 2003: 350–354. (in Polish)

54. Wunder PA. Endocrinology of the sex. Moscow: Medicine; 1980. (in Russian)

55. Rosenfield RL. Hyperandrogenism in peripubertal girls. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 1990; 37(6): 1333–1358.

56. Klorin AI, Chtetsov VP. Biological problems of the doctrine of man’s constitution. Leningrad: Science; 1979. (in Russian)

57. Geodakyan VA. The theory of gender differentiation in human problems. Moscow: Science; 1989. (in Russian)

58. Medvedev V. Hormones play. SPEED-INFO, 2004; 20: 26. (in Russian)




How to Cite

Vrublevskiy E, Skrypko A, Asienkiewicz R. Individualization of selection and training of female athletes in speed-power athletics from the perspective of gender identity. Physical Education of Students. 2020;24(4):227-34.

Abstract views: 572 / PDF downloads: 411